And therefore a complete gaslight on top of everything else!

It's also probably predicated on some BS about an "AI" version of granny, not so?

Can you please detail? We are not directly involved.

I agree but add, as CAI's editor (not always the person behind this account but am today) the essays strike me as complementary but not duplications.

The BS authors are more invested in Frankfurt and in rebutting lying; Fredrikzon is more interested in an epistemological argument.

Could be misremembering but I think this essay was submitted before ChatGPT is Bullshit" - certainly during the revision process author might have had the chance to see it.

This NYT essay had a similar logic: basically, if ppl succumb to ELIZA effect then AGI is nigh. (Um, no.)

“Constant lying is not about making people believe a lie, but about ensuring that no one believes anything. A people who no longer distinguish between truth and lies cannot distinguish between good and evil: a people deprived of the power to think,”
Hannah Arendt.

Are we there yet?

Apologies for the typo! Here's the Kemper link (and enjoy the Vadde review!) read.dukeupress.edu/critical-ai/...