Yes, Superman Has Always Been an Immigration Story
When filmmaker James Gunn called his new Superman film an immigrant story, critics accused him of politicizing Superman. But you can’t politicize the truth. Superman has been an “illegal alien” for 87 years—a fact we helped America remember when we launched our 2013 campaign, Superman Is an Immigrant. Of course, we couldn’t have predicted Donald Trump—the man DC Comics literally used as their model to reboot Lex Luthor in 1986—waging war on the very immigrants Superman represents. In 2000, Luthor became president in the comics, complete with an anti-alien agenda. No one imagined the real President Trump would follow the same playbook. Superman entered America without papers, a baby refugee fleeing a dying planet. Like countless immigrants before him, he changed his name from the foreign-sounding (in his case, Hebrew) Kal-El to the anglicized Clark Kent. He learned new customs, balanced his heritage with his adopted culture, and used his unique abilities to serve the nation that initially feared him. This isn’t subtext—it’s text. Superman’s creators, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, were children of Jewish immigrants who understood displacement intimately. In 1938, as Hitler rose to power, they created a hero who embodied their American dream: someone who could protect the vulnerable because he knew what it meant to be cast aside. Superman’s very essence springs from being what he called “a universal outsider.” This outsider status isn’t incidental to his heroism; it’s the source of it. Those who have known rejection become champions of acceptance. Those who have felt powerless fight for the defenseless. Today, that outsider would be deported. In fact, without birthright citizenship, Superman would never have existed at all. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, born in Cleveland to Jewish immigrant parents, would have been stripped of citizenship and deported to Nazi-controlled Europe—to face certain death in countries they’d never known. No Jerry and Joe means no Superman. No Superman means no superhero genre. The children of immigrants who followed their lead—creating Batman, Captain America, Spider-Man, and at least 90 percent of all iconic superheroes—would have met the same fate. The modern mythology that defines American popular culture worldwide: all erased. Superman endures because he represents something larger than politics: the American paradox itself. We are a nation built by the displaced—willing immigrants and unwilling slaves, refugees and dreamers, all orphaned from somewhere else. Superman, the ultimate orphan, transforms this shared wound into purpose, proving that our greatest strength comes not from where we’re born, but from what we choose to become. In 2013, our campaign sparked a national conversation through a simple selfie challenge: Americans sharing their family immigration stories while declaring “Superman Is an Immigrant.” Critics inadvertently amplified our message—every time they said the phrase to mock it, they reinforced the undeniable truth of it. As Gunn’s film opens and Trump’s deportation machine accelerates, that truth feels more urgent than ever. Superman returns to theaters just days after America’s final Fourth of July before its 250th birthday. The question isn’t whether we’ll continue celebrating our independence, but whether we’ll remember what made us super in the first place. At Monday’s premiere, Gunn said, “This is a movie about kindness, and I think that’s something everyone can relate to.” But media on the right, in fact, does not seem able to relate to this message of kindness. On Fox News, Jesse Watters joked under a “Superwoke” chyron that Superman’s cape reads “MS-13” and questioned whether he is “from Uganda.” The conservative outlet Outkick argued that America doesn’t have “to be ‘kind’ just because a fictional character from another planet brought some good to a fictional Earth,” and that “America is desperate for apolitical entertainment.”