Crash Wigley
@crash-w.bsky.social
Surprising to hear Akua Reindorf KC speak in such strong terms when the EHRC’s statutory code of practice, laid before Parliament in 2010 and issued in 2011, says that service providers should treat trans people according to the gender role in which they present. www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
June 6, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Surprising to hear Akua Reindorf KC speak in such strong terms when the EHRC’s statutory code of practice, laid before Parliament in 2010 and issued in 2011, says that service providers should treat trans people according to the gender role in which they present. www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
I think this is a compelling (and admirably succinct) piece. Thanks for sharing @robertmullins.bsky.social.
I've written a brief note on the Supreme Court's interpretation of s7 of the Equality Act in For Women Scotland. I'd welcome any comments.
open.substack.com/pub/robmulli...
open.substack.com/pub/robmulli...
A Note on the UK Supreme Court's Interpretation of s7 of the Equality Act
I had initially not intended to write about For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers—the recent decision in which the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom concluded that references to gendered terms lik...
open.substack.com
May 12, 2025 at 11:49 AM
I think this is a compelling (and admirably succinct) piece. Thanks for sharing @robertmullins.bsky.social.
I’ve written about the For Women Scotland judgment for the @ukcla.bsky.social blog - please take a look and share as you see fit!👇🏻
Crash Wigley: For Women Scotland: A Case of Significant Silences ukconstitutionallaw.org/2025/05/06/c...
Crash Wigley: For Women Scotland: A Case of Significant Silences
For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16 is a judgment that has triggered great public discussion about the position of trans people in Great Britain (for an interesting discussion of…
ukconstitutionallaw.org
May 6, 2025 at 12:45 PM
I’ve written about the For Women Scotland judgment for the @ukcla.bsky.social blog - please take a look and share as you see fit!👇🏻
Reposted by Crash Wigley
April’s Supreme Court decision is being treated as the final word.
But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by over 20 years, says barrister @crash-w.bsky.social:
goodlaw.social/d4n8
But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by over 20 years, says barrister @crash-w.bsky.social:
goodlaw.social/d4n8
For Women Scotland: a legal critique | Good Law Project
April’s Supreme Court decision is being treated as the final word. But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by ...
goodlaw.social
April 30, 2025 at 11:35 AM
April’s Supreme Court decision is being treated as the final word.
But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by over 20 years, says barrister @crash-w.bsky.social:
goodlaw.social/d4n8
But the judgment has introduced considerable uncertainty to the law, and some parts appear to set back the rights of trans people by over 20 years, says barrister @crash-w.bsky.social:
goodlaw.social/d4n8
Reposted by Crash Wigley
From @crash-w.bsky.social A powerful legal critique of the UKSC Decision. 'The judgment has jeopardised the UK’s compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights and introduced considerable uncertainty to the interpretation of the Equality Act 2010.’
www.translegalproject.org/post/for-wom...
www.translegalproject.org/post/for-wom...
For Women Scotland: a legal critique
Download this article here:Introduction This article critically discusses the judgment in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16. I have tried where possible for it be accessible to n...
www.translegalproject.org
April 29, 2025 at 12:23 PM
From @crash-w.bsky.social A powerful legal critique of the UKSC Decision. 'The judgment has jeopardised the UK’s compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights and introduced considerable uncertainty to the interpretation of the Equality Act 2010.’
www.translegalproject.org/post/for-wom...
www.translegalproject.org/post/for-wom...