If humans stopped fishing the ocean, completely. How would that effect our climate?

Instead, simply release the audit. It’s straightforward—everything in the government is documented. If the evidence exists, let America see it. Rather than turning the Super Bowl into a political spectacle, release the audit and let Americans decide.

Most shelters have a forced choice between euthanasia, and turning animals away. In a world where all of them chose to turn animals away, we would have far less rescued, sheltered, and more suffering/breeding on the street. Breeders are the problem. www.peta.org/about-peta/w...

Rank the following individual actions by how much good they can output: Driving electric, Eating vegan, Switching to solar power, Avoiding air travel.

Assume the perspective of a median American.

What work is the word “human” doing here? Is the value of all sentient experience increasing?

Fair point. I'd challenge you to promote this practice in a more wholesome and inclusive way.

Vegan diets prevent the release of about the same amount of Co2 each month as flying a US domestic flight, and additionally preserve water, forest, and grain.

Your point is taken, and it's unfortunate that it even needs said.

High standard of living and environmental impact are not directly proportional. Or at least they don't need to be.

I'd enjoy seeing you tackle some of the more persuasive antinatalist arguments.

___________ of the Gaps

Peter Singer beat you to it. He already has one of these.