Chris Pitcher
@cpitcher.bsky.social
Doing NHS digital stuff. Interested in building things, data, coding, and public policy. Previously an apprenticeship coach, school data manager and teacher.
Is there any info on where this hypothetical action might take place? Only because I think the last time Trump tried something similar in UK courts he.... lost www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...
Trump ordered to pay $382,000 after losing UK lawsuit over Steele dossier
Orbis, founded by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele, compiled allegedly damaging intelligence on Trump in 2016
www.theguardian.com
November 10, 2025 at 3:44 PM
Is there any info on where this hypothetical action might take place? Only because I think the last time Trump tried something similar in UK courts he.... lost www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024...
This might feel like splitting hairs but I think the language here is super important if we are to understand and use LLMs appropriately. If we try to project intelligence on to these things based on misunderstanding the tech, that's on us (though the AI hype train has a lot to answer for) /end
November 8, 2025 at 10:46 AM
This might feel like splitting hairs but I think the language here is super important if we are to understand and use LLMs appropriately. If we try to project intelligence on to these things based on misunderstanding the tech, that's on us (though the AI hype train has a lot to answer for) /end
At one point the article reads:
"'Mere presence plus an ambiguous reaction under stress falls short of proving shared intent beyond a reasonable doubt in my view' ChatGPT explained"
My issue is with the word "explained". ChatGPT does not understand, it is not intelligent, so cannot "explain". 4/n
"'Mere presence plus an ambiguous reaction under stress falls short of proving shared intent beyond a reasonable doubt in my view' ChatGPT explained"
My issue is with the word "explained". ChatGPT does not understand, it is not intelligent, so cannot "explain". 4/n
November 8, 2025 at 10:42 AM
At one point the article reads:
"'Mere presence plus an ambiguous reaction under stress falls short of proving shared intent beyond a reasonable doubt in my view' ChatGPT explained"
My issue is with the word "explained". ChatGPT does not understand, it is not intelligent, so cannot "explain". 4/n
"'Mere presence plus an ambiguous reaction under stress falls short of proving shared intent beyond a reasonable doubt in my view' ChatGPT explained"
My issue is with the word "explained". ChatGPT does not understand, it is not intelligent, so cannot "explain". 4/n
I believe we also need to be much more careful with the language we actually humans use around LLMs. I've even done this wrong myself in this thread by using the word "they" to describe LLMs - "it" is probably more appropriate since anthropomorphising these models is part of the problem 3/n
November 8, 2025 at 10:37 AM
I believe we also need to be much more careful with the language we actually humans use around LLMs. I've even done this wrong myself in this thread by using the word "they" to describe LLMs - "it" is probably more appropriate since anthropomorphising these models is part of the problem 3/n
LLMs are just text generators. They do not weigh up evidence. They do not understand the law, because they don't understand. They have no concept of "fact", "right" or "wrong", because they have no concepts. They just splurge out the most statistically likely reasonable words. 2/n
November 8, 2025 at 10:34 AM
LLMs are just text generators. They do not weigh up evidence. They do not understand the law, because they don't understand. They have no concept of "fact", "right" or "wrong", because they have no concepts. They just splurge out the most statistically likely reasonable words. 2/n
A smart admin would have moved to drop this "case" on Tuesday before the polls closed
November 6, 2025 at 9:44 PM
A smart admin would have moved to drop this "case" on Tuesday before the polls closed
Am also very interested to find the source on this to see the methodology used, please share if you find! As someone who is in the pilot, all I will say is "I don't recognise these numbers"
October 24, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Am also very interested to find the source on this to see the methodology used, please share if you find! As someone who is in the pilot, all I will say is "I don't recognise these numbers"
Reposted by Chris Pitcher
The more you learn at the moment the more you realize that so much of what’s going to pop the bubble is straight up physics and resources. It’s not clear if you can even build a gigawatt data center campus let alone power one, and GB200s have a negative 100% gross margin. Oracle bought 400,000!
October 18, 2025 at 6:52 AM
The more you learn at the moment the more you realize that so much of what’s going to pop the bubble is straight up physics and resources. It’s not clear if you can even build a gigawatt data center campus let alone power one, and GB200s have a negative 100% gross margin. Oracle bought 400,000!
AI bros: this is not like last time, totally not a bubble, everybody relax
Also AI bros: just like last time even if it goes bad you'll get nice things
Also AI bros: just like last time even if it goes bad you'll get nice things
October 11, 2025 at 9:07 AM
AI bros: this is not like last time, totally not a bubble, everybody relax
Also AI bros: just like last time even if it goes bad you'll get nice things
Also AI bros: just like last time even if it goes bad you'll get nice things
Remarkably light given sunrise was at 7:02 in Leeds today 🤨
September 28, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Remarkably light given sunrise was at 7:02 in Leeds today 🤨