Chrissetti
banner
cpgarghan.bsky.social
Chrissetti
@cpgarghan.bsky.social
Writer | Leftist | Brummie | Vegan | Cis | (He/Him)
Me watching this... Only joking, looks great!
a man in a white shirt and blue jacket is looking at the camera with a serious look on his face .
ALT: a man in a white shirt and blue jacket is looking at the camera with a serious look on his face .
media.tenor.com
November 13, 2025 at 9:04 PM
November 13, 2025 at 7:59 PM
It's sad not to be even slightly awed that you're in a place that was important to people thousands of years ago and the stones are still standing
November 13, 2025 at 4:38 PM
"Why did you complain that I crashed the car into a tree? You've been saying we need to change direction for hours now"

🙄
November 12, 2025 at 1:44 PM
... so the rococo elements look like cheap adornments. Even if all the features were genuinely expensive and artisinally crafted, they're out of place and look tacky because they're not speaking to the architecture of the building.

They're a knockoff Rolex and gold chain on a patched tweed suit
November 12, 2025 at 7:09 AM
... like wearing a tuxedo jacket over a polo shirt - the styles don't marry up.

The reason it looks cheap is because the style he's going for is closer to rococo or baroque which was all about excess and filling every space. The WH still has the big blank spaces from its neoclassical design...
November 12, 2025 at 7:09 AM
It's like when you describe an outfit of not speaking a single coherent language.

The building is designed in a neoclassical style, which was predominantly about stripping away the excess of the earlier baroque style.

When you apply a load of gilding and flamboyance over that, it looks wrong...
November 12, 2025 at 7:09 AM
There is a War Museum in Sarajevo dedicated to children who lived through the siege. It was one of the most harrowing things I've ever seen. The idea that people were paying to do that for fun is sick.
November 11, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Doctor Who usually has the best long-running approach to canon: reference it where it makes a good story, ignore it where it doesn't. This is something that RTD seems to have forgotten in his most recent series
November 11, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Suspect Guilty GIF
ALT: Suspect Guilty GIF
media.tenor.com
November 11, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Continuity obsessives have ruined modem media
November 11, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Good grief
a cartoon character named charlie brown is running in a field
ALT: a cartoon character named charlie brown is running in a field
media.tenor.com
November 11, 2025 at 7:02 AM
The only downside to Bluesky is when you mute someone, the other people in the thread don't get to see what was said 😅

I thought I was being pretty fair. Could have just left it at the UK example, but also looked at the US to show that sometimes the ceiling can come down as he claimed.
November 11, 2025 at 12:56 AM
bsky.app/profile/cpga...

In what world are people with £10m of assets 'in poverty'? Give your head a wobble.
The proposal currently gaining signatures in the UK Parliament is a 2% tax on assets over £10m. That would safely exclude Joe Bloggs et all
November 10, 2025 at 11:13 PM
I've demonstrated that isn't the case
November 10, 2025 at 11:11 PM
*though I accept that's a UK e.g. In the US, income tax was introduced in 1913 (ignoring pre- 16th Amendment taxes which were dubiously legal) at about $98k

The point is that the ceiling doesn't have to come down, and if it's set at £10m it would need to come down ENORMOUSLY to hit ordinary people.
November 10, 2025 at 10:04 PM
When the income tax was introduced by Pitt the Younger in 1799 it was set to kick in at £60, the equivalent of about £11,500 today.

Today, the income tax comes in at £12,570.

The ceiling for the one tax you've given as an example has gone up...
November 10, 2025 at 9:51 PM
The proposal currently gaining signatures in the UK Parliament is a 2% tax on assets over £10m. That would safely exclude Joe Bloggs et all
November 10, 2025 at 4:08 PM