It’s just that you don’t see its fermionic properties.
It’s just that you don’t see its fermionic properties.
Other solutions have similar expressions.
Other solutions have similar expressions.
This is because photons getting too close to the Eah will always fall in.
More precisely, there is a critical impact parameter b_c = 3 sqrt(3) r_S/2 below which photons fall in the BH.
That’s the size of the shadow.
This is because photons getting too close to the Eah will always fall in.
More precisely, there is a critical impact parameter b_c = 3 sqrt(3) r_S/2 below which photons fall in the BH.
That’s the size of the shadow.
Compactifications preserving the minimal amount of SUSY are Calabi Yau compactifications.
We don’t know much about the 0 susy case.
Compactifications preserving the minimal amount of SUSY are Calabi Yau compactifications.
We don’t know much about the 0 susy case.
From the spacetime perspective you can also formulate it as a field theory, an approach which is known as « string field theory ». So again, not so different.
From the spacetime perspective you can also formulate it as a field theory, an approach which is known as « string field theory ». So again, not so different.
However, via holography, we think that some gauge theories (usual QFTs without gravity) can be the full non perturbative definition of string theories.
So at the end QFT and ST might be 2 faces of the same thing.
However, via holography, we think that some gauge theories (usual QFTs without gravity) can be the full non perturbative definition of string theories.
So at the end QFT and ST might be 2 faces of the same thing.
When you introduce interactions, you consider a path integral over all topologies.
Higher genus topologies are suppressed by the string coupling that turns out to be the dilaton in the low energy GR.
When you introduce interactions, you consider a path integral over all topologies.
Higher genus topologies are suppressed by the string coupling that turns out to be the dilaton in the low energy GR.
This is no different than quantizing the electromagnetic field in QFT.
But then you get the physical spectrum and there are massless spin 2 states, aka gravitons !
This is no different than quantizing the electromagnetic field in QFT.
But then you get the physical spectrum and there are massless spin 2 states, aka gravitons !
Then you introduce creation/annihilation operators for the independent solutions, with the usual algebra, and study the Hamiltonian.
Then you introduce creation/annihilation operators for the independent solutions, with the usual algebra, and study the Hamiltonian.
In the simplest consistant (= anomaly free) examples you usually get 10d supergravity.
You can start from there and look for compactifications down to 4d.
Or you can look for other ways to cancel the anomaly.
In the simplest consistant (= anomaly free) examples you usually get 10d supergravity.
You can start from there and look for compactifications down to 4d.
Or you can look for other ways to cancel the anomaly.
www.thphys.uni-heidelberg.de/courses/weig...
See in particular sec. 5.6 that addresses what you are asking for.
In general you get the Einstein’s equations for pure GR + particular matter content.
www.thphys.uni-heidelberg.de/courses/weig...
See in particular sec. 5.6 that addresses what you are asking for.
In general you get the Einstein’s equations for pure GR + particular matter content.