BernardSSharfman
@corpgov.bsky.social
Corporate governance, administrative law, and liberal conservatism. Currently thinking about "for the protection of investors" or "in the public interest."
Unbelievable. Or, not.
August 14, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Unbelievable. Or, not.
To get proxy advisors under control, another way must be found. For example, see my Harvard Corp Gov blog post from six years ago, Fiduciary Duties of Proxy Advisors Under the Investment Advisors Act, lnkd.in/eUTXqN9 .
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
July 13, 2025 at 9:28 PM
To get proxy advisors under control, another way must be found. For example, see my Harvard Corp Gov blog post from six years ago, Fiduciary Duties of Proxy Advisors Under the Investment Advisors Act, lnkd.in/eUTXqN9 .
Interesting. I did not know. I was not compensated for my writing. So, I do not believe I am a scab.
July 9, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Interesting. I did not know. I was not compensated for my writing. So, I do not believe I am a scab.
Please provide more explanation.
July 9, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Please provide more explanation.
Is that really a bad thing? It may be the only way to keep control of entitlement spending.
June 20, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Is that really a bad thing? It may be the only way to keep control of entitlement spending.
Of course, once Musk funds the formation of the party, the party should then kick him out.
June 6, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Of course, once Musk funds the formation of the party, the party should then kick him out.