Talk to it long enough and it's not so hard to get it to respond as if its politics are in the red corner. You've just got to use the right framing device.

I think the main problem is that the eyes are too small. Something that makes things cute is having big eyes. I don't know why they went with small beady eyes.

I blame FNAF.

But they aren't interested in doing anything to help the world like this, just in lining their own pockets. Because under modern capitalism, it's no longer enough to create a fantastically successful piece of robotic hardware. You want to control the software lifespan of that robot forever.

You can even imagine a version of this where volunteers help people that are elderly or physically disabled that have one of these and operate the robot for them. And each client of the charity has, let's say, a certain number of uses of the robot per day.

The clauses 'a chance of' and 'in the mind of' are doing all of the work.

Yeah, I should have written, all that matters is that it has a chance of being profitable, in the mind of an insane billionaire like Elon Musk.

That corporation can be a shareholder in a startup, and that gives them just enough plausible deniability to take the profit.

I think with the concept of startups, people no longer care if something is tasteful. All that matters is that it's profitable. Because the capital does not need to be associated anymore with a large corporation.

"We have to keep developing child-killing death ray technology because if we don't, then China will and China can't be the only one to have that kind of technology."

I think that the fact that people in China are also developing AI systems is just an instant thought-stopping cliche in their mind. That means that they have to keep developing these systems no matter what harms they cause. Because, God forbid the Chinese get ahead of us technologically in anything.

At least, I have not seen anything stating this, and the vibes feel very much to the contrary. So prove me wrong if you can.

For me, I think this is really the biggest red flag. That their employees are allowed to control the robot and see all of what it can do. But you are not allowed to control the robot with the software they have, even if you buy one. That's insane to me.

This is not like a hackable system or an open system. You aren't allowed to, for example, take control of the robot body. They say that that's some kind of safety violation I'm sure. But if we take things to that extreme, how is the whole thing not a safety violation?

This robot called Neo is essentially a robotic body with cameras in the eyes that allow workers (perhaps originally in the United States, but if economies of scales take over, it will definitely be in the cheapest labour markets) to peer inside of your home and to do chores for you.

The waterfall plot is nothing special. You can make one out of any audio file you have. It's just used to visualize the audio coming in so I can tune it correctly. But I guess some people might find it for if they've never seen it before. I assume you already know, just writing for people who don't~

(That's something I can't do on my car radio, but just because it's old. It's a 2013 model. lol)