Anyway if you're a very sharp analyst within a particular discipline/policy domain, then becoming successful and subsequently succumbing to the temptation of all-purpose punditry is one of the most dangerous roads to damnation.

Had a hard time believing what I was reading the first time I heard of this. Incredibly wild. Will definitely be getting the book…

My wild speculation—MGT is running for president in ‘28. She doesn’t think any republican on the wrong side of Epstein files has a chance to win.

This is amazing.

This…this is incredible.

Bingo. The move to dependency functionally both essentializes gender and legitimizes a particular male hierarchy—same garbage new wrapping.

I remember, years ago, reading about the “arguments” which resulted in her conversation and finding the thinking very sloppy and specious.

Affection, mutuality, and reciprocity can exist in a relationship in which religious convictions aren’t shared but a common ethic is. There is little possibility of any of that when a core tenant of a belief system is the conviction that someone who believes otherwise is damnable for it.

Is the other one Henry Ford?