Entity
contextual.bsky.social
Entity
@contextual.bsky.social
Caffeine addict. Amateur being. Nerd.
Don't tell him that, it'll just make him more excited.
December 18, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Then they don't deserve to be one of the "best game developers".
December 11, 2025 at 10:18 AM
For most of the world outside of America; Liberals have always been considered right wing, or at least right leaning. They may be willing to toy with progressive ideas, but as soon as it threatens their bottom line those ideas are tossed aside.
November 1, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Instant mashed potatoes are a war crime even before you add the Monster.
October 6, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Someone has been practicing their villain speech, I see.
September 29, 2025 at 11:03 PM
This would explain why Trump and co. fear the autistic.
September 29, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Doubt it, most android phones are black by default.
September 24, 2025 at 2:44 PM
All the people who get rights are cishet white men, but not all cishet white men get rights.
September 18, 2025 at 11:19 AM
Transphobia pipeline.
September 13, 2025 at 6:52 PM
Pretty sure "great" was from the guy who asked him the question on the audience mic, not Charlie.
September 12, 2025 at 8:14 AM
Have you considered the possibility that we are simply spreading the hatred?

"I had to see this and now so do you" mentality.
July 18, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Damn, the race science enjoyers really keep crawling out of the woodwork to be bigots for this post.

Context.
No and also context.
Incorrect.
July 4, 2025 at 8:39 PM
That is absolutely not how facts work.

I'm inclined to say the same of you.
July 3, 2025 at 3:05 PM
You are tragically correct that the ability to use critical thinking is "fashionable", not so much about it being an ideology though.

Also scientific "facts" aren't a thing, and if you think they are, you have fundamentally failed to understand the purpose of science.
July 3, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Of course I am, no field of study exists in isolation and it's important to understand how you apply the labels to certain topics.

Maybe you should engage in the field of philosophy and apply some logical rigor to why you cling desperately to 19th outdated biological categorism?
July 3, 2025 at 2:16 PM
This is not true. Your sex is descriptive not proscriptive. Those characteristics do in fact determine what sex you are considered.

While the characterisations are structured around reproductive functions, it's blatantly not exclusive to them.
July 3, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Sex is a collection of physical and biological attributes that are grouped together to form various sexes.

If you change how those attributes are categorised you get different sexes. You can shove everything into male and female if you don't like thinking but it's a very reductive method
July 3, 2025 at 1:58 PM
As many as any given society deems worth while categorising.

Two has become the default thanks to Christian puritanism and western colonialism, but prior to that three or four were relatively common.
July 3, 2025 at 11:19 AM
The earth is an oblate spheroid and you are doing the sex equivalent of race science.
July 3, 2025 at 9:22 AM