Our dataset shows the same pattern: repeated moves to centralize power in the executive - IG blackouts, blocked apportionment data, loyalty screening, and attempts to narrow oversight. Courts and Congress have been pushing back, but the pressure on independent agencies is very real.

The path forward requires structural imagination: transparency as baseline, upstream accountability, and institutions built for continuous oversight - not episodic responses. Full report here:
clubknowledge.com/regulatory-s...

If opacity, automation, and extraction incentives remain unchecked, firms - not public institutions - will effectively set the rules of the market through system design. That’s the new governance challenge.

Micro-harm compounds: biased models → mispriced credit → higher insurance → fewer housing options. No single action triggers alarm, but the accumulation reshapes economic opportunity.

We show how data asymmetry, automation, and procedural barriers turn legal rights into theoretical protections. The law still promises fairness - but enforcement can’t keep pace with modern system design.

Agencies, courts, and legislatures still work - but only for the old world of large, visible violations. Today’s harms are automated, continuous, and buried in proprietary systems. The gap is widening, and it’s measurable.

This is a pivotal moment. If the Court takes the case, the ruling could reshape how easily states can lock in restrictive voting rules. The concern isn’t just Texas - it's how a decision here could limit future fights for fair access across the country.

Whether you agree or disagree, this is one of the biggest pivots in decades, happening almost entirely outside public conversation.

At the same time, NATO is being told to prepare for a 2027 deadline where Europe carries most of the defense weight.

This isn’t just foreign policy. It’s a structural shift in America’s global identity - without a congressional debate.

Birthright citizenship keeps things simple: if you’re born here, you’re a citizen. End that, and every birth becomes an immigration case. The Court may allow it. The country has to live with it.

Advocates warn the fallout is huge: stateless kids, blocked benefits, and long-term uncertainty. Citizenship shifts from a birth fact to a bureaucratic decision point-with millions stuck in limbo.

The Court will focus on constitutional text and a case from 1898. It won’t model the real-world machinery needed to classify every newborn. Doctrine is tidy; implementation isn’t.