concernedskeptic.bsky.social
@concernedskeptic.bsky.social
No safe spaces for fascists.
So to be clear, when someone is pushing an orange orangutans fecal matter talking point there is no real need to fact check. You can easily tell because the bot that attempts to trick dumb people into scams has already posted something about contacting them for "investment" or will be along shortly.
March 5, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Violate your oath? That's grounds for impeachment. Issue an illegal order? That's grounds for impeachment and an obligation NOT to follow that order. Granted the House and Senate need to get their shins kicked, but they will fall in line once the public is howling for metaphorical blood.
February 23, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Best choice? Swap them out at the next vote, monitor the guard rails to ensure he isn't trying to use any of that "best judgement" without accountability and continue society. But what if they try to avoid our jump over the guard rails? That's where the Constitution has got you covered.
February 23, 2025 at 8:46 PM
So here is what hurts. If a Democrat changes sides to Republican it is usually because they now believe that the public does not know what is best for itself and must now be guided by their hand. Ow. People and views can change.
February 23, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Most Democrats have overwhelmingly come from community service, public service, civil rights groups, protecting the public as a whole. Once again neither are wrong, just different.
February 23, 2025 at 8:39 PM
I am sure if you think about it for more than two minutes you will realize that if you look at the majority of sources of Republican vice Democrat origins, like their job history, can actually tell you a lot. Republicans overwhelmingly seem to come from all parts of church leadership. Leaders again.
February 23, 2025 at 8:35 PM
The Democrats are stuck trying to take care of everyone as the Republicans attack vulnerable groups for simple political clout. The smaller and more vulnerable the group the better. Easier to control the narrative if all your constituents get their info from a sanctioned source.
February 23, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Once that happened though it became a buyers market for making your fortune. If you could get this small group of people to vote you in they won't question you till it is time for reelection trusting you will take care of them next time too.
February 23, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Here's the party trick: The Republican party has ALWAYS been about selecting a "leader" and letting him do his thing to get them what they want. They didn't have to worry because their mindset is built to trust that the leader they selected represents themselves and "is just like them".
February 23, 2025 at 8:18 PM
People with less than sincere plans started to appear, making promises to smaller groups (who weren't cool with the changes) in return for their submission and votes. No saying they were bad maybe misguided. The politician also may not want what they want.
February 23, 2025 at 8:15 PM
So as the populace were forced to get along with their new citizens the goal of the democratic party changed. More for all the people, not just who selected you. Republicans faced the opposite.
February 23, 2025 at 8:12 PM
The taking point of "Democrats were originally for slavery" is thrown around as initially, yes, the general voting populace were irrationally afraid of what could possibly happen once the slaves they mistreated for generations were freed.
February 23, 2025 at 8:10 PM
He's panicking because he realizes that the language and laws they are trying to exploit also have legal protections and provisions. They require common law, definitions, usage and interpretations to be followed when brought to court for any reason. No weasel words or baseless propaganda.
February 23, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Why do you think they are now trying to play hot potato for who is running doge? Right now that semi-sentient orange glob of tanning butter and his sycophants are exploiting the system to do the legally grey things they are. "No specific rule against it, must be okay to do."
February 23, 2025 at 10:02 AM
Never follow an order unless there are legally enforceable protective provisions in there for you. They must actually in writing say THEY are responsible for your actions when the orders were followed. Because that is how real EOs having no legal standing should be written when CRITICALLY needed.
February 23, 2025 at 9:56 AM
The current conundrum is this. The orange generic sentai villain reject is just really running just his fat gob. But if you follow his quasi-legal EOs you may be opening up yourself to a whole dumpster fire of legal issues. EOs are just demands. As long as they are not blatantly against the law...
February 23, 2025 at 9:44 AM
Lesson: Whoever is sitting in ANY seat of elected power where an oath to the Constitution is should automatically compel the start of impeachment procedures when they break their oath.

Yeah, should.

But our Constitution still stands strong even under attack.
February 23, 2025 at 9:38 AM
The deal was that they will bend the knee to this seat of power as long as the rules established in this Constitution are followed. Otherwise they and possibly their other constitutional supporting peers would show up and ensure a change took place.
February 23, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Oh, yes. If any of my accounts get reported and removed, I am cathartic. It means I was able to get under the skin of another idiot. One who thinks that they have power, but the best they can do is report the account for being mean to them. Like a toddler! Toddler's with no other power but to cry.
February 22, 2025 at 4:49 PM
So now I bully the wastes of space. I can't REALLY get through to them. BUT I can get though to the rational people who see this situation and also don't like it. I call the them parasites. Sycophants. Yes-men, toady, minion, henchman, shein sidekick, stooge, etc. AIs are great when used properly.
February 22, 2025 at 4:43 PM