Isaac Shaffer
@computer-bugs.bsky.social
Rock climbing physicist turned statistician and CS instructor... Weeee!
100% Disagree. Nothing about immortality implies freezing progress. It's just a different timeline for a lifespan.
Unless you are suggesting immortality through cryogenics. And then the conclusion is literal and obvious.
Unless you are suggesting immortality through cryogenics. And then the conclusion is literal and obvious.
November 11, 2025 at 8:17 PM
100% Disagree. Nothing about immortality implies freezing progress. It's just a different timeline for a lifespan.
Unless you are suggesting immortality through cryogenics. And then the conclusion is literal and obvious.
Unless you are suggesting immortality through cryogenics. And then the conclusion is literal and obvious.
Wrong angle. It's not the case that corporate America lives under the umbrella of an all-powerful federal government. It is far more accurate to say that the figureheads in our government represent corporate interest. CEOs (or the boards that they represent) are the funders for both parties.
November 11, 2025 at 8:14 PM
Wrong angle. It's not the case that corporate America lives under the umbrella of an all-powerful federal government. It is far more accurate to say that the figureheads in our government represent corporate interest. CEOs (or the boards that they represent) are the funders for both parties.