Youtube link to the main playlist:
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

You may enjoy #collapsemusic playlists I've made with the help of some fellow collapsniks.
Main playlist: open.spotify.com/playlist/0d4...
B-sides:
open.spotify.com/playlist/4lr...

It's representing partial demasking. Loss of cooling is warming. Still I agree with the first point. Hausfath had uncertainties about the strength of the forcing calculated. Instead of just taking the 50th percentile. He could've also shown this graph assuming 25/75 or 10/90

Great work, smooth read, clean graphs. Bit late, but I Wish you all the best in this new year

While a model showed it could be as low as ~310K (www.aanda.org/articles/aa/...) I doubt that humanity is capable of 23.35K of global warming

288.15K
Looking at the absolute value is virtually only useful in astrophysical context of runaway greenhouse transition. The GMST at which oceans boil away into space. Usually found at 320-330K in literature

Better to call it 1.6C. Sadly media loves shaving the details with "First year above 1.5C" headlines

There an uncomfortable difference between avoiding collapse in theory and in practice

Collapse hitting the mainstream. At least grazing, still a rare instance

Yes, it's a classic case of regulating something decades after it starts causing damage. Not everything will let us be so careless

Thank you.
I'm a bit unsatisfied with the regional scale, although given the recent surge in AMOC studies, there's probably one on a global level in the making already.

The only study that I know of regarding the opening question
www.nature.com/articles/s43...