Why does he have access to Twitter?

You’ll be better tomorrow

This is nothing but an off ramp for a man that needlessly put himself in a corner by never equivocating in his calls to own Greenland.

The article only says the Post filed a motion today. No word in it of the Court ruling?

I think this is an actual example of begging the question.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Is Homan always drunk? He is incapable of getting a sentence out without slurring.

How late are they going to deliberate tonight?

He claimed Hernandez got unfairly rail roaded as a justification for pardoning him, yet he is straight up murdering alleged traffickers without even a performative nod of due process. He has zero coherent principles beyond doing what is personally profitable.

If a lawsuit filed immediately after the passage of a new map is too close to the election for courts to be involved, it should mean it was too late for the state to draw new maps. It is so backwards for SCOTUS to say these issues evade judicial review.

“When I was a newer on the bench, a friend asked me, ‘Now that you've been a judge for a few years, do you have any particular advice?’

“I replied, ‘Always sit with your back to the wall.’”

It is basically tied now, so I think my assessment was correct.

https://bsky.app/profile/wilsonforseattle.bsky.social/post/3m5cubhwxz22z
(Edited 4:20 PM via @skeetsapp.com)

Not about blame. It’s about reducing innocent losses of life.

They might drive away in a non-peaceful manner sometimes. But as long as it is <100%, there will be fewer instances of reckless driving. Also, they will return to a normal driving pattern more quickly than when actively being chased.

The objective data—including from cities that have stopped allowing them—overwhelmingly supports banning pursuits. Obv the fleeing driver is primarily at fault, but the proximate cause was the police chase in almost every one of these cases.

Police chases cost lives and should be prohibited in every jurisdiction.

I don’t think he knows what that word means

Yeah, that’s a toss up in Seattle. 2 pts closer and I would say Wilson is the favorite.