This article is so irresponsible. Journalistic integrity feels foreign. I can read between the bullshit & tell when someone's telling me to interpret an event a certain way, but why do I have to exercise this daily?
Just report on events. Stop poisoning the well, that's manipulative.
Just report on events. Stop poisoning the well, that's manipulative.
October 6, 2025 at 1:27 PM
This article is so irresponsible. Journalistic integrity feels foreign. I can read between the bullshit & tell when someone's telling me to interpret an event a certain way, but why do I have to exercise this daily?
Just report on events. Stop poisoning the well, that's manipulative.
Just report on events. Stop poisoning the well, that's manipulative.
This is where I'll exclusively be getting my news from now on.
October 5, 2025 at 5:08 PM
This is where I'll exclusively be getting my news from now on.
They're literally agreeing with you & you're immediately knee jerk condescending them on their intelligence as if it weren't obvious what they were saying?
Then quote post them & their profile for people who aren't going to see any retraction for your misunderstanding.
That's foul, do better.
Then quote post them & their profile for people who aren't going to see any retraction for your misunderstanding.
That's foul, do better.
October 5, 2025 at 5:02 PM
They're literally agreeing with you & you're immediately knee jerk condescending them on their intelligence as if it weren't obvious what they were saying?
Then quote post them & their profile for people who aren't going to see any retraction for your misunderstanding.
That's foul, do better.
Then quote post them & their profile for people who aren't going to see any retraction for your misunderstanding.
That's foul, do better.
The phrase "in terms of" is becoming a legitimate trigger. Someone gave this to him & he's never looked back.
September 29, 2025 at 1:47 PM
The phrase "in terms of" is becoming a legitimate trigger. Someone gave this to him & he's never looked back.
I'm the same way with food as I am drinks; Doesn't always need to be an experience, but it's nice to experience different tastes once in a while.
September 29, 2025 at 12:50 PM
I'm the same way with food as I am drinks; Doesn't always need to be an experience, but it's nice to experience different tastes once in a while.
I'm gonna play your game tonight & see if I can cook you something up. Use it or not, no worries, I just love writing satire & checking out new games, so I win twice.
September 25, 2025 at 3:20 PM
I'm gonna play your game tonight & see if I can cook you something up. Use it or not, no worries, I just love writing satire & checking out new games, so I win twice.
You've chosen perfectly, you just need to capitalize on the opportunity with clever satire.
If you need help brainstorming, I can't even decide how much of my life is real vs parody of myself at this point.
If you need help brainstorming, I can't even decide how much of my life is real vs parody of myself at this point.
a man with a beard is crying and saying `` i 've got mad skills . ''
ALT: a man with a beard is crying and saying `` i 've got mad skills . ''
media.tenor.com
September 25, 2025 at 2:53 PM
You've chosen perfectly, you just need to capitalize on the opportunity with clever satire.
If you need help brainstorming, I can't even decide how much of my life is real vs parody of myself at this point.
If you need help brainstorming, I can't even decide how much of my life is real vs parody of myself at this point.
Eh, it's a good start, but if you miss your flights completely, think about the cardio you'd be able to get in.
September 25, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Eh, it's a good start, but if you miss your flights completely, think about the cardio you'd be able to get in.
No disagreements there.
September 18, 2025 at 7:28 PM
No disagreements there.
That's pragmatic, I was just answering the question in front of me.
As long as you can strive for tax designation, which you should, then that's feasible, but lack of supplemental investment would likely delay by decades.
I'm not Canadian so I'm speaking purely in theory with limited context.
As long as you can strive for tax designation, which you should, then that's feasible, but lack of supplemental investment would likely delay by decades.
I'm not Canadian so I'm speaking purely in theory with limited context.
September 18, 2025 at 6:15 PM
That's pragmatic, I was just answering the question in front of me.
As long as you can strive for tax designation, which you should, then that's feasible, but lack of supplemental investment would likely delay by decades.
I'm not Canadian so I'm speaking purely in theory with limited context.
As long as you can strive for tax designation, which you should, then that's feasible, but lack of supplemental investment would likely delay by decades.
I'm not Canadian so I'm speaking purely in theory with limited context.
To incentivize future investments.
You could argue that a different incentive structure should be adopted, but I'm just answering based on the incentive structure that we currently operate from.
You could argue that a different incentive structure should be adopted, but I'm just answering based on the incentive structure that we currently operate from.
September 18, 2025 at 6:04 PM
To incentivize future investments.
You could argue that a different incentive structure should be adopted, but I'm just answering based on the incentive structure that we currently operate from.
You could argue that a different incentive structure should be adopted, but I'm just answering based on the incentive structure that we currently operate from.
Because every event is a political device to create turmoil & bickering to avoid accountability or attention on the regime overtaking our government.
Most aren't equipped to stay resilient to this, especially those who claim they are.
Most aren't equipped to stay resilient to this, especially those who claim they are.
September 18, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Because every event is a political device to create turmoil & bickering to avoid accountability or attention on the regime overtaking our government.
Most aren't equipped to stay resilient to this, especially those who claim they are.
Most aren't equipped to stay resilient to this, especially those who claim they are.
It should be US vs MAGA, but so long as one side benefits from the power they wield, they're going to allow it to perpetuate.
It amazes me how much effort we all exert just to avoid saying that the normalization of this behavior is the leading contributor.
It amazes me how much effort we all exert just to avoid saying that the normalization of this behavior is the leading contributor.
September 17, 2025 at 10:03 PM
It should be US vs MAGA, but so long as one side benefits from the power they wield, they're going to allow it to perpetuate.
It amazes me how much effort we all exert just to avoid saying that the normalization of this behavior is the leading contributor.
It amazes me how much effort we all exert just to avoid saying that the normalization of this behavior is the leading contributor.
Left vs Right is legacy politics. We've not had this kind of climate in all of US history so it's not that the US will never change, it's that it has changed.
It'll always have problems, absolutely, but the bickering of the pre-Obama era wasn't even a candle light to this flame.
It'll always have problems, absolutely, but the bickering of the pre-Obama era wasn't even a candle light to this flame.
September 17, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Left vs Right is legacy politics. We've not had this kind of climate in all of US history so it's not that the US will never change, it's that it has changed.
It'll always have problems, absolutely, but the bickering of the pre-Obama era wasn't even a candle light to this flame.
It'll always have problems, absolutely, but the bickering of the pre-Obama era wasn't even a candle light to this flame.
This is true for largely any pursued interest. Natural talent is rare, even rarer that it's in the realm you're passionate about. Some become passionate because they're naturally good, but nonetheless, every skill is pursued interest.
Pursued interest is resilience to failure.
Pursued interest is resilience to failure.
September 17, 2025 at 5:55 PM
This is true for largely any pursued interest. Natural talent is rare, even rarer that it's in the realm you're passionate about. Some become passionate because they're naturally good, but nonetheless, every skill is pursued interest.
Pursued interest is resilience to failure.
Pursued interest is resilience to failure.
Thanks for the vocabulary expansion, never heard the word "fealty" before.
Agreed, however, especially considering how much damage has been done to black communities deliberately with programs in place to offset that damage now suspended or under siege.
Deconstructing equity isn't equality.
Agreed, however, especially considering how much damage has been done to black communities deliberately with programs in place to offset that damage now suspended or under siege.
Deconstructing equity isn't equality.
September 16, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Thanks for the vocabulary expansion, never heard the word "fealty" before.
Agreed, however, especially considering how much damage has been done to black communities deliberately with programs in place to offset that damage now suspended or under siege.
Deconstructing equity isn't equality.
Agreed, however, especially considering how much damage has been done to black communities deliberately with programs in place to offset that damage now suspended or under siege.
Deconstructing equity isn't equality.
Is "applause" authentic or is it more complacency? Those details do matter.
September 16, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Is "applause" authentic or is it more complacency? Those details do matter.
You need to socialize more of that seemed like anger. This interaction was weird, but anyways, be well, take care.
September 13, 2025 at 3:37 PM
You need to socialize more of that seemed like anger. This interaction was weird, but anyways, be well, take care.
Sorry, do you know their votes?
Don't think about the world through the lens of a child. Operate on what you know, speculate on what you don't, but don't confirm what you can't.
Don't think about the world through the lens of a child. Operate on what you know, speculate on what you don't, but don't confirm what you can't.
September 13, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Sorry, do you know their votes?
Don't think about the world through the lens of a child. Operate on what you know, speculate on what you don't, but don't confirm what you can't.
Don't think about the world through the lens of a child. Operate on what you know, speculate on what you don't, but don't confirm what you can't.
"Foul-hoo-hoo-hoo-hooo"
September 12, 2025 at 6:56 PM
"Foul-hoo-hoo-hoo-hooo"
That who pardoned? Trump? No, 0 pardons were acceptable. January 6th was a domestic terrorist attack.
Holy hell your mind is warped if you think that's what "illegals" are doing as a standard.
You drank the Kool-Aid, pal. Good luck to you, be well.
Holy hell your mind is warped if you think that's what "illegals" are doing as a standard.
You drank the Kool-Aid, pal. Good luck to you, be well.
September 12, 2025 at 4:06 PM
That who pardoned? Trump? No, 0 pardons were acceptable. January 6th was a domestic terrorist attack.
Holy hell your mind is warped if you think that's what "illegals" are doing as a standard.
You drank the Kool-Aid, pal. Good luck to you, be well.
Holy hell your mind is warped if you think that's what "illegals" are doing as a standard.
You drank the Kool-Aid, pal. Good luck to you, be well.
Now I know that's eutopian view, so not feasible, but your go-to solution is "let's arm the teachers" over "let's make firearms more difficult to access" so I want you to argue for that.
The idea that widespread gun violence will be solved with more gun violence is ridiculous. Argue it, though.
The idea that widespread gun violence will be solved with more gun violence is ridiculous. Argue it, though.
September 12, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Now I know that's eutopian view, so not feasible, but your go-to solution is "let's arm the teachers" over "let's make firearms more difficult to access" so I want you to argue for that.
The idea that widespread gun violence will be solved with more gun violence is ridiculous. Argue it, though.
The idea that widespread gun violence will be solved with more gun violence is ridiculous. Argue it, though.
..right, I don't think you're getting it, but you're new to your party, so you'll get their views down in time.
Sure, let's give teachers guns. Now we've gone from 10 kids dying to just 4. Now 2+ guns in the school instead of 1. This is pretty sensible.
What if, instead, we made it.. 0 guns.
Sure, let's give teachers guns. Now we've gone from 10 kids dying to just 4. Now 2+ guns in the school instead of 1. This is pretty sensible.
What if, instead, we made it.. 0 guns.
September 12, 2025 at 4:02 PM
..right, I don't think you're getting it, but you're new to your party, so you'll get their views down in time.
Sure, let's give teachers guns. Now we've gone from 10 kids dying to just 4. Now 2+ guns in the school instead of 1. This is pretty sensible.
What if, instead, we made it.. 0 guns.
Sure, let's give teachers guns. Now we've gone from 10 kids dying to just 4. Now 2+ guns in the school instead of 1. This is pretty sensible.
What if, instead, we made it.. 0 guns.
You don't even agree with what you're pedalling, indicative by the contradictions, so what's up? Is this cognitive dissonance or what?
You can disavow shitty people affiliated with a political alignment you still agree with, you know? You don't need to treat it like a high school clique.
You can disavow shitty people affiliated with a political alignment you still agree with, you know? You don't need to treat it like a high school clique.
September 12, 2025 at 3:45 PM
You don't even agree with what you're pedalling, indicative by the contradictions, so what's up? Is this cognitive dissonance or what?
You can disavow shitty people affiliated with a political alignment you still agree with, you know? You don't need to treat it like a high school clique.
You can disavow shitty people affiliated with a political alignment you still agree with, you know? You don't need to treat it like a high school clique.