@cnzewi.bsky.social
That was lovely. Needed that. Thank you
September 28, 2025 at 6:58 PM
That was lovely. Needed that. Thank you
Seriously. Does Bernie EVER read the room?
Congress has allowed the Executive to arbitrarily set trade policy. Congress should be figuring out how to take that power back.
Instead he's wasting time on quixotic agenda.
He could go overseas have press conferences and drive 47 crazy, instead of this
Congress has allowed the Executive to arbitrarily set trade policy. Congress should be figuring out how to take that power back.
Instead he's wasting time on quixotic agenda.
He could go overseas have press conferences and drive 47 crazy, instead of this
April 9, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Seriously. Does Bernie EVER read the room?
Congress has allowed the Executive to arbitrarily set trade policy. Congress should be figuring out how to take that power back.
Instead he's wasting time on quixotic agenda.
He could go overseas have press conferences and drive 47 crazy, instead of this
Congress has allowed the Executive to arbitrarily set trade policy. Congress should be figuring out how to take that power back.
Instead he's wasting time on quixotic agenda.
He could go overseas have press conferences and drive 47 crazy, instead of this
Hey! Welcome here 😊
April 8, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Hey! Welcome here 😊
I almost want this to happen so these nuts can all die off.
If they want to catch life threatening viruses why stop them? They are morons
If they want to catch life threatening viruses why stop them? They are morons
March 10, 2025 at 10:34 AM
I almost want this to happen so these nuts can all die off.
If they want to catch life threatening viruses why stop them? They are morons
If they want to catch life threatening viruses why stop them? They are morons
Unfortunately he actually does. At least the White ones anyway
March 10, 2025 at 9:55 AM
Unfortunately he actually does. At least the White ones anyway
Farmer says he's "powerless to do anything, except take what comes".
What a loser. You could have voted against this nonsense to start with, and you can complain to your Republican leaders. They're not kings. Bootlicker.
What a loser. You could have voted against this nonsense to start with, and you can complain to your Republican leaders. They're not kings. Bootlicker.
March 10, 2025 at 9:51 AM
Farmer says he's "powerless to do anything, except take what comes".
What a loser. You could have voted against this nonsense to start with, and you can complain to your Republican leaders. They're not kings. Bootlicker.
What a loser. You could have voted against this nonsense to start with, and you can complain to your Republican leaders. They're not kings. Bootlicker.
But sir, EVERY American president provides weapons to Isreal. They are an ally of the US. Biden pushed back on Bibi and worked furiously behind scenes as best he could. And he is the one who achieved the ceasefire. So why no credit for his actual results?
And why punish Harris? How was that helpful
And why punish Harris? How was that helpful
February 5, 2025 at 4:27 AM
But sir, EVERY American president provides weapons to Isreal. They are an ally of the US. Biden pushed back on Bibi and worked furiously behind scenes as best he could. And he is the one who achieved the ceasefire. So why no credit for his actual results?
And why punish Harris? How was that helpful
And why punish Harris? How was that helpful
Ok. Well, you got what you wanted.
Please enjoy Trump and his American Facism.
Please enjoy Trump and his American Facism.
February 5, 2025 at 4:23 AM
Ok. Well, you got what you wanted.
Please enjoy Trump and his American Facism.
Please enjoy Trump and his American Facism.
A vote for anyone but Harris was implicitly a vote for Trump.
And the proof is in the results. I think we can put that argument to bed.
And the proof is in the results. I think we can put that argument to bed.
February 5, 2025 at 4:15 AM
A vote for anyone but Harris was implicitly a vote for Trump.
And the proof is in the results. I think we can put that argument to bed.
And the proof is in the results. I think we can put that argument to bed.
Why punish Democrats politically for a situation that is not in our control, endanger ALL the causes we fight for; and then TURN AROUND and reward Trump who literally doesn't care?
It doesn't make any sense politically, or rationally.
It almost feels like, because they are suffering, burn it all.
It doesn't make any sense politically, or rationally.
It almost feels like, because they are suffering, burn it all.
February 5, 2025 at 4:12 AM
Why punish Democrats politically for a situation that is not in our control, endanger ALL the causes we fight for; and then TURN AROUND and reward Trump who literally doesn't care?
It doesn't make any sense politically, or rationally.
It almost feels like, because they are suffering, burn it all.
It doesn't make any sense politically, or rationally.
It almost feels like, because they are suffering, burn it all.
But can you PLEASE understand how frustrating this "both sidesism" is for Democrats. We spent a LOT of political capital working for this cause, and it costs us votes.
And then Trump who did NOTHING, gets their votes and he actively hurts them.
We are baffled! We can't change the world overnight.
And then Trump who did NOTHING, gets their votes and he actively hurts them.
We are baffled! We can't change the world overnight.
February 5, 2025 at 4:08 AM
But can you PLEASE understand how frustrating this "both sidesism" is for Democrats. We spent a LOT of political capital working for this cause, and it costs us votes.
And then Trump who did NOTHING, gets their votes and he actively hurts them.
We are baffled! We can't change the world overnight.
And then Trump who did NOTHING, gets their votes and he actively hurts them.
We are baffled! We can't change the world overnight.
Thank you! This is so timely
January 22, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Thank you! This is so timely
Jeff, I hear you, but reaching American voters takes lots of money, especially when all the channels of communication are prejudiced against us.
Voters don't pay attention, and when they can be bothered, pick the easy, dumb, often wrong narrative. Countering that takes money. Bear with Dems.
Voters don't pay attention, and when they can be bothered, pick the easy, dumb, often wrong narrative. Countering that takes money. Bear with Dems.
January 21, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Jeff, I hear you, but reaching American voters takes lots of money, especially when all the channels of communication are prejudiced against us.
Voters don't pay attention, and when they can be bothered, pick the easy, dumb, often wrong narrative. Countering that takes money. Bear with Dems.
Voters don't pay attention, and when they can be bothered, pick the easy, dumb, often wrong narrative. Countering that takes money. Bear with Dems.
Thanks for sharing 👍
January 18, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Thanks for sharing 👍
Reposted
I got this resource from an immigration officer that came to my school office to give to the families I serve and anyone
January 18, 2025 at 3:13 AM
I got this resource from an immigration officer that came to my school office to give to the families I serve and anyone
I don't know. Many couldn't be bothered to simply vote, and of those that did about half voted for the Empire
So don't know if we can expect the kids to save us
So don't know if we can expect the kids to save us
January 17, 2025 at 11:20 PM
I don't know. Many couldn't be bothered to simply vote, and of those that did about half voted for the Empire
So don't know if we can expect the kids to save us
So don't know if we can expect the kids to save us
This is a big part of it. But lots of folks don't want to accept this.
January 17, 2025 at 9:09 PM
This is a big part of it. But lots of folks don't want to accept this.
Good! Imagine the cheek
January 17, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Good! Imagine the cheek
But I've read that chivalry was only towards women/people of the same noble class (and mayber priests).
So literally didn't apply to 95% of people in their society.
So did chivalry actually change behaviors, or was it just a convenient veneer that could be discarded at will whenever inconvenient?
So literally didn't apply to 95% of people in their society.
So did chivalry actually change behaviors, or was it just a convenient veneer that could be discarded at will whenever inconvenient?
January 17, 2025 at 1:39 AM
But I've read that chivalry was only towards women/people of the same noble class (and mayber priests).
So literally didn't apply to 95% of people in their society.
So did chivalry actually change behaviors, or was it just a convenient veneer that could be discarded at will whenever inconvenient?
So literally didn't apply to 95% of people in their society.
So did chivalry actually change behaviors, or was it just a convenient veneer that could be discarded at will whenever inconvenient?
Nice! I'll look up Chrystia Freeland. Didn't know of her. Knew of Carney from his BofE days.
Keep fighting the good fight 💪
Keep fighting the good fight 💪
January 17, 2025 at 1:06 AM
Nice! I'll look up Chrystia Freeland. Didn't know of her. Knew of Carney from his BofE days.
Keep fighting the good fight 💪
Keep fighting the good fight 💪