(3/3)

(2/3)

You’re on the side of the angels, mate. Good work!

(2/2) …which is a bit of a struggle, when you have a history of - for instance - equating extraordinarily high US health prices with medical advances, despite the fact that most medical advances are funded through the NIH, NSF, et al, or were until Spring ‘25.

(1/2) Megan is a right-leaning libertarian, which as a practical matter is a redundant phrase, given that the natural end game of a libertarian system is oligarchy. Libertarians are currently non-entities in the GOP. So she needs an audience to the left of the MAGA base…

I’ve read the (apparently partial) transcript of the interview. Bannon knows Trump is flying by the seat of his pants, but insists that it’s 4D chess. I’m not in favor of platforming a propagandist, but in the text he appears not to have steamrolled you. TG it wasn’t Leavitt, have been too much.

Ah, you’re dealing with the Dipshit Paradox (again)? Between that, Brandolini’s Law, and sealioning, I’ve gotten a lot more comfortable just posting and ignoring the comments, but nobody bothers to lie about my positions.

Perhaps it’s a bit much to hope the NYC diner won’t have been to the Greater Los Angeles Area lately - say since March, 2020 - and can thus suspend their disbelief of the ambiance long enough to transport themselves one bite at a time.

At the risk of repeating one of the 300+ other replies, yeah Breunig is just talking about - if I’m generous - OECD babies, but is likely visualizing white babies.