Way to go! :)

Well you look great!

Literally crushing his L4-L5. I must be explaining the joke.

What evidence could even convince us
That no one is actually addicted to porn
and/or
That no one can be,
or whatever on earth the actual claim is
?

Rich men whose wealth does not enrich them:

Proud towers,
to swift destruction doomed.

Surely the value of knowing the effects of multilingualism is that people could choose to learn another language to gain benefits?

It seems an RCT assigning people to language training would get a more relevant treatment effect than the whole effect (whatever it is) of a lifetime as multilingual.

I think even Manski bounds are constrained by the support of the variable when it's observed.

I think these bounds are out of (Manski) bounds.

Maybe if you click yes they throw out the person's whole application.

Only the people with the most conscientious connections need apply.

If you are engaged in unlawful activity by my definition (e.g. occupying a city) you should not be legally protected from injuries you receive from someone engaged in self-defense that is proportional to the illegality of your actions.

Not endorsing violence! But I'd acquit if it was a brick.

I think there is gold in it, which is kind of a stone?

Hard to imagine a real researcher having an opinion.

I have a mapping from assumptions to conclusions...

but I'll die before I tell you whether I believe my assumptions!

I'm not sure about that.

I use a more conservative approach in which I recall the max and min of garlic cloves I have observed, add those together, and double it.

New levels of making up people to be mad at.

There's the feeling I was looking for when I logged onto Bluesky. I can log off now.

Seems like we could just say white people aren't responsible for the historical accident of the circumstances that allowed their domination of other groups. I.e. their power isn't because they are smarter or harder working.

Then we can say whatever true thing we want about specific atrocities.