Also since this is the first public mention of the Logseq CLI, I'd like to thank @borkdude.bsky.social for #nbbcljs. Rapid development and reuse of Logseq's core for the CLI is possible thanks to github.com/babashka/nbb

Having a CLI MCP server for any Logseq DB file opens the door to some novel workflows:
1. A developer can deploy a public HTTP MCP server and allow others to talk to a Logseq graph.
2. A developer can start a MCP server in CI and connect a headless LLM client to query and/or update a graph file.

I'd love it if residents could propose ballot measures. But since we can't, how would they make it a priority?

Thanks for the fun read. Your article generated some discussion at news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4410...

Good to know. I haven't tried gemini yet with structured output but I should try my script with it. A downside of ollama is that response times are 8-10s on my laptop. I'm guessing gemini would be much quicker

While the demo shows using a schema.org ontology, the code can be used by any Logseq DB graph - github.com/logseq/nbb-l... . If anyone tries out on their graph's ontology, I'll be curious to hear how it goes

The demo's workflow relies on a Logseq graph's ontology, which are its tags and properties. This demo demonstrates how impactful the right ontology can be. For graphs that are shared with others or rely on external data sources, reusing existing ontologies can make a major difference

While there is the expected 20-40% hallucination rate, I'm surprised capturing relationships between concepts is more accurate than that. Perhaps there's a useful workflow with LLMs to capture relationships b/n concepts and then rely on other data sources for capturing specific data about a concept

One cool thing that DB graph exports can do is export your's graph ontology (tags and properties). This allows users to share their workflows and data model without sharing any personal graph data. Try it with the `Export graph's tags and properties EDN data` command

The agenda pdf is under the Minutes column and has green checkmark icon to click. There aren't any of those in 2025. You have to click on the 2024 tab to even see any. For example, www.durhamnc.gov/AgendaCenter... is the last published minutes from 2024

In the meantime, you can use filmot.com to search the CityofDurhamNC video channel e.g. search for "Falls Lake" with -https://filmot.com/search/%22falls%20lake%22/1?gridView=1&channelID=UCHUDjJ4VIFaf3a9ap9s5qEA . The search isn't limited to city council meetings but could help find somethings

If the city published its minutes in pdfs consistently, it would be possible to search them. Weirdly they haven't published a meeting minutes since 10/24/24 - www.durhamnc.gov/AgendaCenter...

Great ideas. Agree the eastside of the street is preventing it from living up to its potential. If any new retail got added on the eastside perhaps that could be a revenue generator to motivate the change

Agreed. I wonder if something like the carless Orange St would be a good candidate