***clay***
@clayplaythyme7.bsky.social
*RagingAuntie* BLM* ILM* *AIPIM*🌈* Friend of animals * resister sister * lapsed poet * stud.of clay * stud. of Scottish Gaelic* geography geek* Southern Appalachian & Nolichucky Strong* 💙🫂🫶 *Don't panic* Organize* former farmwrkr* She/Her* here 4 art* 🚫DMs
Reposted by ***clay***
I think what is happening here is that Jackson is doing the 48hr pausing so the First Circuit (hopefully) declines to place a stay pending appeal (which would be a longer stay) and then the Court will be in the tougher position of delaying SNAP for a longer stay period.
#BREAKING: Justice Jackson has issued an "administrative" stay, temporarily pausing a district court order that would've required the USDA to continue using contingency funds to pay SNAP benefits.
The stay expires 48 hours after the First Circuit rules on USDA's request for a stay pending appeal.
The stay expires 48 hours after the First Circuit rules on USDA's request for a stay pending appeal.
November 8, 2025 at 3:05 AM
Have fun in the comment option (feedback on the "explanation" of SNAP cutoff) www.fns.usda.gov
www.fns.usda.gov
October 27, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Have fun in the comment option (feedback on the "explanation" of SNAP cutoff) www.fns.usda.gov
Reposted by ***clay***
Do something!!! Go to www.fns.usda.gov and click the "feedback" button. Then tell them exactly what you think!! I did and if enough of us did we could choak the system. This is no time to sit and complain. Even small actions add up.
www.fns.usda.gov
October 26, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Do something!!! Go to www.fns.usda.gov and click the "feedback" button. Then tell them exactly what you think!! I did and if enough of us did we could choak the system. This is no time to sit and complain. Even small actions add up.