Clare
@clare-bear.bsky.social
Cat-servant, family solicitor, honey-thief.
"queerphobia" oh behave.
August 14, 2025 at 3:50 PM
"queerphobia" oh behave.
A far more generous, gracious, and thoughtful response than any of these screaming babies deserve.
August 14, 2025 at 2:19 PM
A far more generous, gracious, and thoughtful response than any of these screaming babies deserve.
Ah, I was told Blue sky was where all the kind, tolerant, virtuous people went.
Obviously that wasn't the case.
Obviously that wasn't the case.
August 14, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Ah, I was told Blue sky was where all the kind, tolerant, virtuous people went.
Obviously that wasn't the case.
Obviously that wasn't the case.
Can you give an example where gay people's rights would conflict with those of straight people?
August 14, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Can you give an example where gay people's rights would conflict with those of straight people?
He blocked me for asking questions like that...
June 13, 2025 at 10:51 AM
He blocked me for asking questions like that...
Thank you, that is helpful, but I'm not sure it's the smoking gun, surely? Will you make a FoI request to see if they contributed?
Out of interest, which silk represented them at court? I couldn't see one named, I know Adam Wagner was for GLP.
Out of interest, which silk represented them at court? I couldn't see one named, I know Adam Wagner was for GLP.
June 12, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Thank you, that is helpful, but I'm not sure it's the smoking gun, surely? Will you make a FoI request to see if they contributed?
Out of interest, which silk represented them at court? I couldn't see one named, I know Adam Wagner was for GLP.
Out of interest, which silk represented them at court? I couldn't see one named, I know Adam Wagner was for GLP.
I guess I'm asking for the justification for asserting as a fact something she has denied in such a forum, without some hard evidence to show the truth of the claim.
I can't see support for the proposition in the judgment, but I could be missing it, of course.
I can't see support for the proposition in the judgment, but I could be missing it, of course.
June 12, 2025 at 4:14 PM
I guess I'm asking for the justification for asserting as a fact something she has denied in such a forum, without some hard evidence to show the truth of the claim.
I can't see support for the proposition in the judgment, but I could be missing it, of course.
I can't see support for the proposition in the judgment, but I could be missing it, of course.
Oh I see. That makes sense! But, why are you saying the Commission was doing that? I don't see anything in the judgment that supports the assertion that they were behind the landlord's action, and Falkner has told the committee that it's untrue and defamatory to say they were.
June 12, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Oh I see. That makes sense! But, why are you saying the Commission was doing that? I don't see anything in the judgment that supports the assertion that they were behind the landlord's action, and Falkner has told the committee that it's untrue and defamatory to say they were.
What is that a quote from, please? I can't see it in the judgment.
June 12, 2025 at 3:33 PM
What is that a quote from, please? I can't see it in the judgment.
Alternatively, people could look at NC1, which straightforwardly removes the woman from the criminal justice system altogether (NC20 does not do that.) NC1 is supported by all abortion providers. NC20 is supported by none.
June 12, 2025 at 10:40 AM
Alternatively, people could look at NC1, which straightforwardly removes the woman from the criminal justice system altogether (NC20 does not do that.) NC1 is supported by all abortion providers. NC20 is supported by none.
I think it's because Tonia Antoniazzi who wrote the other amendment is a gender critical feminist, therefore anything she does must be wrong.
June 12, 2025 at 9:40 AM
I think it's because Tonia Antoniazzi who wrote the other amendment is a gender critical feminist, therefore anything she does must be wrong.
How does your application affect the EHRC getting on with the consultation process?
June 6, 2025 at 5:15 PM
How does your application affect the EHRC getting on with the consultation process?
No one "has access" to the Supreme Court.
4WS simply won their case, as the Court came to the same conclusion as them about the proper construction of the Act.
Similarly, the High Court was not satisfied the high bar to proceed with a judicial review was met by Liberty.
4WS simply won their case, as the Court came to the same conclusion as them about the proper construction of the Act.
Similarly, the High Court was not satisfied the high bar to proceed with a judicial review was met by Liberty.
June 6, 2025 at 5:13 PM
No one "has access" to the Supreme Court.
4WS simply won their case, as the Court came to the same conclusion as them about the proper construction of the Act.
Similarly, the High Court was not satisfied the high bar to proceed with a judicial review was met by Liberty.
4WS simply won their case, as the Court came to the same conclusion as them about the proper construction of the Act.
Similarly, the High Court was not satisfied the high bar to proceed with a judicial review was met by Liberty.
None of those people are the 5 Supreme Court Justices who ruled that sex in the Equality Act = biological sex.
So it doesn't matter a bit what they say.
So it doesn't matter a bit what they say.
June 6, 2025 at 2:20 PM
None of those people are the 5 Supreme Court Justices who ruled that sex in the Equality Act = biological sex.
So it doesn't matter a bit what they say.
So it doesn't matter a bit what they say.
There are still a few elderly solicitors like me around that talk about Green Forms.
June 3, 2025 at 10:50 PM
There are still a few elderly solicitors like me around that talk about Green Forms.
No, EHRC's landlords were seeking to stop protests on their privately owned land.
June 3, 2025 at 7:03 PM
No, EHRC's landlords were seeking to stop protests on their privately owned land.
Blimey, HH was not happy with F's representative!
April 30, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Blimey, HH was not happy with F's representative!
Have you time to go out to Karlstejn Castle? If you do, and you can get on the tour that takes you to the special chapel, you should 100% do it. The most extraordinary place, and a fun train ride through the countryside to get there.
April 19, 2025 at 8:56 PM
Have you time to go out to Karlstejn Castle? If you do, and you can get on the tour that takes you to the special chapel, you should 100% do it. The most extraordinary place, and a fun train ride through the countryside to get there.
Such an incredible city!
April 19, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Such an incredible city!
Well I have read around a fair bit, and I have gathered that true hermaphroditism (having functioning male & female reproduction systems) does not occur in humans.
Do you mean the various disorders of sexual development, perhaps?
Do you mean the various disorders of sexual development, perhaps?
April 18, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Well I have read around a fair bit, and I have gathered that true hermaphroditism (having functioning male & female reproduction systems) does not occur in humans.
Do you mean the various disorders of sexual development, perhaps?
Do you mean the various disorders of sexual development, perhaps?
I don't think humans are ever "hermaphrodites", have you any documented cases of such?
April 17, 2025 at 9:19 AM
I don't think humans are ever "hermaphrodites", have you any documented cases of such?
Seems odd Sara's mother, a party to the proceedings in question, isn't a party here, whilst the stepmother is.
January 14, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Seems odd Sara's mother, a party to the proceedings in question, isn't a party here, whilst the stepmother is.
What a thing to do. And then she called her mum and bragged about how great her note was.
Absolute bastard.
Absolute bastard.
January 10, 2025 at 5:51 PM
What a thing to do. And then she called her mum and bragged about how great her note was.
Absolute bastard.
Absolute bastard.