optimized for readability

Let's see what people say ;)

True!

But maybe it should be called the fundamental theorem of Bayesian Statistics.

I like Abraham Wald's Complete Class Theorem, now sometimes known as Pearce's Lemma: a strategy is undominated (in the set of mixed strategies) iff it is Bayesian (a best reply to some belief about the opponent's strategies). So I guess this is your last point, but I like the uniterated version.

Right. Like Biometrika just with Econ. Am not falling for that!

you can underline everything :)

Our answer should have been "Game theory is not one hammer but a large toolkit. Moreover, it is exactly the toolkit developed for modelling (consciously or unconsciously) strategic interaction."

I would ideally like more reflection after seeing the model than I usually see. Why certain modelling choices were made or not made. This would require 60mins. But it depends a bit on the content of the paper.

i think you can do both here too

I can come up with an intuition only after doing the math. And yes, I can then explain it without math.

It does!

Q3: What I see is that you have this hammer called game theory and you are desperately (ok this is my addition) trying to find something to hit it with.

Q2: How can plants have intentions?

Q1: When you same game theory you really mean game theory plus, right? For instance, agent based simulation models?