And as is clear. It’s all about being “bigoted as I wanna be.”

Didn’t Musk visit Putin between the election and the inauguration? Seems a likely place for plotting this out.

Could it give SCOTUS an opening to narrow the plain 14th Amendment language,
like they did with the immunity case?

You're saying it's morning in Chicago?

The theory didn’t work out as they hoped, which is one of the reasons there have been no trials, let alone convictions, there 23 years later. For the a complete telling of this story, read “The Terror Courts” by @jessbravin.bsky.social

3. then engage in massive deportation of the "criminal" element that now includes them by definition, it's pretty clear that we're just obstructing entry where the entrants are, you know, brown.

4. And when we're removing from the country predominantly brown people who would otherwise be entitled under US and International Law to be here but for the lack of opportunity, through no fault of their own, to appear before an immigration judge, aren't we engaging in a kind of ethnic cleansing?

5. And while we're thinking about that: How did the idea that immigrants, who do jobs we need done, pay taxes, rebalance our boomer-heavy demographics, commit less crime per capita than we do, bolster our economy (that's documented), and are ambitious and entrepreneurial people overall -

6. How did the idea that that's bad for our country get assumed, get embedded in our national psyche?
The "border issue" is the mouse that roared.
Definition: trump: to get the better of: override.
Yeah, we've been played.

2. And where those ineligible could be turned back promptly? When we starve the immigration system that would provide documentation to the eligible and criminalize people who work around it to escape desperate conditions,

❤️❤️❤️❤️

And Kristy Greenberg.

Last night's A block took some twists, but this is the meat of the thesis: youtu.be/JRVXQsx8RF0