@chugachpoint.bsky.social
Shop cat Hobart. Sweet baby. Has zero fear.
March 19, 2025 at 4:57 AM
Shop cat Hobart. Sweet baby. Has zero fear.
Reposted
You don't play footsies with the Fascist Felon and his goons in the middle of a coup. Every Democrat who voted for this Project 2025 budget must be removed. This is betrayal of our democracy, our party, and our values. We must hold the line!
March 14, 2025 at 10:51 PM
You don't play footsies with the Fascist Felon and his goons in the middle of a coup. Every Democrat who voted for this Project 2025 budget must be removed. This is betrayal of our democracy, our party, and our values. We must hold the line!
**extra points for referencing the failed amendments too
March 14, 2025 at 11:18 PM
**extra points for referencing the failed amendments too
If you got any simmering lines floating around, I want to make a protest song immortalizing the senators that voted for the resolution.
March 14, 2025 at 11:13 PM
If you got any simmering lines floating around, I want to make a protest song immortalizing the senators that voted for the resolution.
“…
Peters and Shaheen have announced they will retire at the end of their current terms.”
Go figure. I’ve seen some commenters state the Schumer was ‘covering’ for other senators who wanted to vote yes. Can we make a poop-umbrella joke somewhere in the lyrics?? 😂
Peters and Shaheen have announced they will retire at the end of their current terms.”
Go figure. I’ve seen some commenters state the Schumer was ‘covering’ for other senators who wanted to vote yes. Can we make a poop-umbrella joke somewhere in the lyrics?? 😂
March 14, 2025 at 10:52 PM
“…
Peters and Shaheen have announced they will retire at the end of their current terms.”
Go figure. I’ve seen some commenters state the Schumer was ‘covering’ for other senators who wanted to vote yes. Can we make a poop-umbrella joke somewhere in the lyrics?? 😂
Peters and Shaheen have announced they will retire at the end of their current terms.”
Go figure. I’ve seen some commenters state the Schumer was ‘covering’ for other senators who wanted to vote yes. Can we make a poop-umbrella joke somewhere in the lyrics?? 😂
“…
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.)
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine)
Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.)
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)
They joined every Republican except Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted against the measure.
…”
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.)
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine)
Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.)
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)
They joined every Republican except Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted against the measure.
…”
March 14, 2025 at 10:51 PM
“…
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.)
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine)
Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.)
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)
They joined every Republican except Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted against the measure.
…”
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.)
Sen. Angus King (I-Maine)
Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.)
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)
They joined every Republican except Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who voted against the measure.
…”
From The Hill: “The Democrats who voted to advance the measure were:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.)
…
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.)
…
March 14, 2025 at 10:50 PM
From The Hill: “The Democrats who voted to advance the measure were:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.)
…
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.)
…
Why are you legitimizing their attempts to further consolidate executive power? You are not giving your constituents and the rest of your potential supporters confidence nor CAUSE for faith in your leadership. Loyalty is not unconditional. Be warned.
March 14, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Why are you legitimizing their attempts to further consolidate executive power? You are not giving your constituents and the rest of your potential supporters confidence nor CAUSE for faith in your leadership. Loyalty is not unconditional. Be warned.