tf does that mean

again, thats what academia describes marxism, whereas in marxism there is a distinction between ideology and scientific research into social and political matters, which is what marxism ultimately is
what im giving you is the marxist definition of marxism itself

QUALITATIVE MEDIA ANALYSIS IS NOT SCIENCE?????? WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT
also the negative is anderson movies being queer

wait no hold on
i just read what i actually wrote bc i forgot
i said you cant prove a negative
thats just a fact

what the fuck are you talking about
im just sayinng im really bad when it comes to explaining what i feel
its a personal issue

no im saying the exact opposite
all issues under capitalism are created or worsened by and because of capitalism
this includes hierarchies, which are a byproduct of capitalism and not vice versa
capitalism itself thrived after the overturning of present hierarchies at the time

bc thats a definition made by bourgeois academia and doesnt reflect the values of dialectical materialism
marxism is a science as it applies the scientific method to the analysis of history, using hegelian dialectics
these arent the exact words but i am not a native speaker so forgive me

no thats just a me thing

i know the principles of anarchism, but that is not the conclusion you get when you analyze history through the lens of dialectical materialism

im sorry but i take offense in this as a scholar
this is insinuating that im either stupid or dont know what im talking about

marxism is not ideological, its a science

yeah but theres so much more than just that
they are anti-hierarchical, but marxists understand that hierarchy is not the cause of issues under capitalism, its more capital that needs to create a hierarchy to function
does that make sense? sometimes i have a very hard time explaining myself

which in itself is ideological, therefore in antithesis to marxism

the complete and total abolishment of capital and all it brings
the annihilation of the state, the family and reactionary sentiments
a total rejection of the status quo in virtue of a society driven by empathy, love and true freedom
i can go on and on and on and on

id also like to point out i didnt say “anarchists” but “anarchism”
i find anarchists great people with incredibly revolutionary potential

that is not what i said
and marxism is so much more than just workplace organization

thats not what marxism is