Chuck Todd
@chucktoddd.bsky.social
Host of The Chuck ToddCast | Head of Politics & Host of “Sunday Night with Chuck Todd" for NoosphereApp | Political Analyst, Journalist, and Former Moderator of Meet the Press
https://thechucktoddcast.com/
https://thechucktoddcast.com/
Believe it or not, those frames were even once upon a time… but after a few months of adjusting lights, cameras, and maybe one too many interviews that ran long, they’ve drifted. I’ll get right on it before it drives any more viewers nuts. Appreciate the eagle eye.
November 11, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Believe it or not, those frames were even once upon a time… but after a few months of adjusting lights, cameras, and maybe one too many interviews that ran long, they’ve drifted. I’ll get right on it before it drives any more viewers nuts. Appreciate the eagle eye.
For many Republican leaders, speaking out now would mean acknowledging that they’ve enabled this behavior for years. That’s a tough political reckoning most still aren’t ready to face.
October 22, 2025 at 1:49 AM
For many Republican leaders, speaking out now would mean acknowledging that they’ve enabled this behavior for years. That’s a tough political reckoning most still aren’t ready to face.
and the party’s silence often signals complicity.
Suing or threatening to sue his own Justice Department for $230 million isn’t just unprecedented, it’s a reflection of how transactional his relationship with institutions of government has always been.
Suing or threatening to sue his own Justice Department for $230 million isn’t just unprecedented, it’s a reflection of how transactional his relationship with institutions of government has always been.
October 22, 2025 at 1:49 AM
and the party’s silence often signals complicity.
Suing or threatening to sue his own Justice Department for $230 million isn’t just unprecedented, it’s a reflection of how transactional his relationship with institutions of government has always been.
Suing or threatening to sue his own Justice Department for $230 million isn’t just unprecedented, it’s a reflection of how transactional his relationship with institutions of government has always been.
It’s a fair question and one a lot of longtime observers are asking. At this point, it’s less about when Republicans will draw a line and more about whether there is a line left to draw. Trump testing the limits of political and legal norms has become almost routine
October 22, 2025 at 1:47 AM
It’s a fair question and one a lot of longtime observers are asking. At this point, it’s less about when Republicans will draw a line and more about whether there is a line left to draw. Trump testing the limits of political and legal norms has become almost routine
Okay, let me know when you have it installed.
October 12, 2025 at 1:24 AM
Okay, let me know when you have it installed.
By the way, could you download Signal? It’s faster and more reliable for messaging and that way I can respond to your texts more easily too.
October 12, 2025 at 12:37 AM
By the way, could you download Signal? It’s faster and more reliable for messaging and that way I can respond to your texts more easily too.
That’s a really good point the idea of one ultra-rich person or group owning multiple major media outlets is worrying. It’s exactly how freedom of speech starts getting chipped away in other countries, and we end up with propaganda instead of journalism.
October 12, 2025 at 12:37 AM
That’s a really good point the idea of one ultra-rich person or group owning multiple major media outlets is worrying. It’s exactly how freedom of speech starts getting chipped away in other countries, and we end up with propaganda instead of journalism.
Look, what you’re describing gets to the heart of the anxiety a lot of people have right now not just about one party or the other, but about the durability of democratic norms. You can check your dm for the rest of the response...
October 1, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Look, what you’re describing gets to the heart of the anxiety a lot of people have right now not just about one party or the other, but about the durability of democratic norms. You can check your dm for the rest of the response...
This is a clear reminder of the strength of our legal system and the high bar for defamation cases, especially involving public figures. The courts continue to serve as a critical check, even in politically charged moments.
September 21, 2025 at 1:38 AM
This is a clear reminder of the strength of our legal system and the high bar for defamation cases, especially involving public figures. The courts continue to serve as a critical check, even in politically charged moments.
Exactly. History has shown time and again that when those with influence stay silent in the face of authoritarianism, it emboldens those in power and erodes the foundations of freedom. The consequences are rarely good, and often devastating.
September 21, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Exactly. History has shown time and again that when those with influence stay silent in the face of authoritarianism, it emboldens those in power and erodes the foundations of freedom. The consequences are rarely good, and often devastating.