Christian Dembski
christiandembski.bsky.social
Christian Dembski
@christiandembski.bsky.social
Oh look, badmouthing labor action on LBC again, must be Friday.
November 14, 2025 at 10:30 AM
Fairness doesn't start with their entrance exams though. If you want to give a leg up to a traditionally oppressed part of the population, be that on economic, religious or ethnic reasons, you have to do it somewhere.
October 24, 2025 at 9:50 AM
Als ob Palästinenser eine wirkliche Wahl hätten. Keine Rechte, kein Land, keine Freiheit und dann wundern wir uns dass die einzigen Typen mit Waffen an der Macht sind? Israel und der Rest der Kollaborateure im Westen sind verantwortlich dafür dass Hamas überhaupt existiert.
October 14, 2025 at 7:30 AM
Nothing really escalated, what are you talking about? The fascist are still fascists and are doing nothing they haven't done before. The president is apparently chill about Kirk, as long as the assassination doesn't distract from the ballroom too much.
October 8, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Have something to say? Just say it.
October 7, 2025 at 12:42 PM
Do the children of Gaza mysteriously stop starving on this day? No? Well maybe that was a silly request you made then, wasn't it?
October 7, 2025 at 11:46 AM
Are you saying protesting against genocide is inciting hatred towards minorities? And if so, is it because they are committing genocide or because of them being a minority? Nobody had a problem with hatred against Germans when we committed genocide. It's more than fair to hate people who do that.
October 3, 2025 at 2:36 PM
That's just submitting to Israel's framing that being against the genocide is the same as being antisemitic. One has nothing to do with the other. Did they stop the genocide in light of the attack? No? Then the protests shouldn't stop either.
October 3, 2025 at 2:33 PM
None of this is applicative anymore. We are living through shocks of getting one or two Watergate-scope scandals a week just from Washington. Anyone expecting news cycles to resemble any shape of relevance is expecting that journalists start doing a job they divested themselves of 50 years ago.
October 3, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Man, the "These guys sure like to promise stuff." line isn't hitting so hard when you have actual fascism. What do you expect? Some republican voter going "Yeah, I was ok with all of this, but I draw the line at hypocrisy."?
October 3, 2025 at 1:58 PM
After his social media manager let him glaze Charlie Kirk in public, I'm not so sure anymore.
September 25, 2025 at 8:11 PM
When your family tree has arrows going in different directions, maybe you shouldn't talk about relationships and children.
September 23, 2025 at 5:58 PM
The answer was "Yes", yet we have this abomination of an answer instead.
What's the fusion between "Left" and "Groyper" we are allegedly observing?
September 15, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Sie haben die Texte von Extremisten auf Social Media zu Sachpunkten in einer journalistischen Unterhaltung erhoben. Das ist einfach journalistische Fahrlässigkeit und hat mit der Bedrohungslage ihrer Gäste doch gar nichts zu tun. Warum macht IHre Entschuldigung das noch schlimmer?
September 12, 2025 at 4:05 PM
People on the left are significantly more likely to be hurt than the rest. If it hurt universally, they wouldn't do it.
September 11, 2025 at 6:55 AM
I never understood the "Don't do that stuff, they will use it against you." argument. It doesn't work against people who openly just make stuff up as they go. Everyone should be in "Hurts, doesn't it?" mode, not in "This is not ok." mode.
September 11, 2025 at 6:36 AM
"Wenig rechtsextreme bei der CDU."
Ja, wir sehen jeden Tag wie die Umfragewerte bei den offenen faschistischen ANstrengungen der CDU wegbrechen, weil sich die Rechten nicht verstanden fühlen.
September 8, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Sure, let's just suppose an LLM would correctly assess the right amount of contempt for the Federalist papers to insert that little jab in there. Then that LLM would also correctly interpret your narrative thrust from you simply posting a location in a text reference. Convenient. smh.
September 8, 2025 at 7:26 PM
That is the situation you have right now. Does it make sense to extrapolate a course forward from an "intended" state of the legal system that doesn't currently exist? Isn't it better to look at the "as-is" version of what's happening and getting to a workable state from there?
September 8, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Vote who, no matter blue.
September 6, 2025 at 3:45 PM
How dare people run on the values most strongly aligned with those of our voters?
September 3, 2025 at 4:29 PM
The article is about the language in the contract, which is relevant because that's where the bread is buttered when these creators show signs of diverging from the policy goals of Chorus. Some creator talking about Chorus without instantly being booted and sued in no way debunks that.
September 1, 2025 at 12:10 AM
It's weird how the receipts showing the language in their contracts confirms the claims made in the Wired article. You need to get some severe mental gymnastics involved to make the "receipts" debunk the article. They've done more to confirm it.
September 1, 2025 at 12:02 AM
And you know that how? Oh, yes, you know that because Taylor's have been disclosed. Unlike the payments run through Chorus.
Nobody has a problem with the money. They have a problem with the secrecy.
August 31, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Honestly, do not degrade the quality of your reporting by using ChatGPT. It only takes one nugget of wrong BS it may spew at any time to discredit you. Any news org looking to count as trustworthy should have a big "No AI in this office" sign on the wall.
July 16, 2025 at 6:52 AM