Chris Rinke
banner
chrisrinke.bsky.social
Chris Rinke
@chrisrinke.bsky.social
Professor of Microbiology @ University of Innsbruck, Austria
Honorary Associate Professor @ The University of Queensland, Australia

Environmental OMICS (E-OMICS) team lead
http://www.rinkelab.org
(former twitter/x account: @ChristianRinke )
- Tangaroaeota phyl. nov. (former RBG-13-66-14)

- Ryujiniota phyl. nov. (former UBA6262) and

- Spongiamicota phyl. nov. (former UBA8248)

In summary, we contributed to the understanding of taxonomic and functional diversity in benthic prokaryotic communities across Western Pacific sediments.
April 27, 2025 at 12:24 PM
... aerobic respiration and photosynthesis in the shallowest sediment layers to heterotrophic carbon utilization, sulphate reduction and methanogenesis in deeper anoxic sediments.

We recovered high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes for all main prokaryotic lineages & proposed names for 3 phyla:
April 27, 2025 at 12:21 PM
- metagenomics based taxonomy revealed clusters across all samples, that mainly aligned with depth & sediment type

- Thermoproteota & Asgardarchaeota were the most abundant archaeal phyla; Archaea relative abundances > 50% in some samples

- Metabolic capabilities ranged from ...
April 27, 2025 at 12:19 PM
... there is now (2025) a new rule 72 in the ICNP that says "if ... the proposed name is a synonym of a pro-validly published and pro-legitimate Candidatus name of the same rank, then that Candidatus name must be reused"
April 3, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Yes, it will be interesting to see how this all plays out - SeqCode vs ICNP.
Using previously introduced names is beneficial indeed, and supports taxonomic stability. It seems that the ICSP has realised that as well ...
April 3, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Re Minisyncoccota paper #1: Besides the Code controversy, it is a good and longstanding practice to consider previous names, when proposing a new name for a lineage. Unfortunately, these authors did not consider this.
March 13, 2025 at 7:56 AM
But, there is obviously a controversy brewing when it comes to authors publishing names under the ICNP that are in conflict with #SeqCode validated names. This is possible since the ICSP does not (yet) recognize SeqCode names. Hopefully that will change soon.
March 13, 2025 at 7:55 AM
Not so fast 😊 , #Patescibacteriota is a validly published phylum name under the #SeqCode and is here to stay ;-)
March 13, 2025 at 7:54 AM
Btw based on phylogenetic diversity, #Patescibacteriota is the fourth-largest phylum in the bacterial domain 😀
February 8, 2025 at 4:59 PM
The paper:

- covers nomenclatural types for higher ranks including the phylum Patescibacteriota

- includes genomic characterization, metabolic reconstruction, and biogeographical analysis of Patescibacterium

- explores the occurrence of long gene coding insertions in the 23S rRNA sequences
February 8, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Hmm seems like bsky is not like Twitter/X once was, not much of a discussion here ... or nobody does amplicon sequencing any more 🤣😱🤔
February 8, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Big congrats to aprabhu90.bsky.social - this is the 2nd paper from her PhD project! 👏
Apoorva Prabhu (@aprabhu90.bsky.social)
Postdoctoral Research Associate - Sydney Institute of Marine Science Honorary Postdoc- University of Technology, Sydney PhD at the Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, The University of Queensland, Bri...
aprabhu90.bsky.social
January 8, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Have you tried it?
November 19, 2024 at 9:13 PM
Great 👍
November 18, 2024 at 5:37 AM