Good to clarify why Trump was in such a rush to leave

Is this maybe even too Australian?

And will be btwn 3-30x more polluting throughout the 2030s?

Or at best…will displace coal (that we will have to pay to extend) by 2043

And is basically unnoticeable on their own modelling till 2045?

So the Libs announced an energy policy in 2024, that basically doesn’t actually generate energy till 2040?

I was struggling to compare the CCA emissions inventories 2023 v 2024…till…

“For the fifth year in a row, revisions to Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (NGGI) in 2024 identified additional land sector sequestration”

Awesome

www.climatechangeauthority.gov.au/sites/defaul...

Don’t forget the “extension of p.53 of the Paris agreement” part before skipping to the “by 2035” part of #cop29

Only 184 ppl kicked off watching the final #cop29 plennary.

If the next NCQG is $300bln per year, that would raise total finance commitment to $3.3trl by 2035

If its just $300 bln “by 2035” BUT $100 bln per year till then, it is only really a commitment of $1.3 trillion total by 2035

#cop29

This range of what climate finance means cumulatively to 2035 is much more important than the number we arrive at in a decade

$1.3 trl by 2035 is only aligned with the estimated need if the pre-2034 finance is also substantial

It is not a $ figure in isolation #COP29

Total Climate finance “by 2035” could range from $1.26 - $14.3 trillion depending on annual contributions 🧵

I wouldn’t worry about this guy too long. Several sources tell me he is flakey and non committal