Chris Höhne
chrishoehne.bsky.social
Chris Höhne
@chrishoehne.bsky.social
Senior Researcher at Wuppertal Institut, previously Post-Doc at Freie Universität Berlin: international relations, norms, multi-level and global governance, global and domestic climate governance, forests, energy, just transition, India, Indonesia
We will draw conclusions to inform the next round of internationally supported just transition approaches.
October 15, 2025 at 10:59 AM
In the #ExpertExchange, we will examine different dimensions of #JustTransitions (procedural, recognition, distributive, restorative, cosmopolitan, intergenerational) and investigate the progress and the challenges that the JETPs face in both countries.
October 15, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Content: The implementation of Just Energy Transition Partnerships across various nations has faced multi-dimensional challenges. Reflecting on these challenges is essential to optimizing future efforts in facilitating internationally supported just transitions - #JTPs.
October 15, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Finally, we thank Thomas Risse and our excellent research assistants Myrodis Athanassiou, Sarah Hechler, Maren Lorenzen-Fischer, and Kristina J. Schmidt. For more information on our research project (funded by DFG), see transnorms.eu
March 12, 2024 at 9:15 AM
Thanks to the editorial team & reviewers @GEP & to @paucastro.bsky.social, Alvine Datchoua, Nicole Doerr, Harald Fuhr, Anna Fünfgeld, Aarti Gupta, Carola Klöck, Markus Lederer,@maxlesch.bsky.social, Jens Marquardt, @mjph.bsky.social, Jens Steffek,@antjewiener.bsky.social, & Jan Wilkens for comments.
March 12, 2024 at 9:14 AM
To conclude, our analysis points to potential avenues for long-term changes of the norm bundle itself and provides indications for future state behavior.
The paper is available here: doi.org/10.1162/glep...
Looking forward to the 3rd NDCs in 2025!
March 12, 2024 at 9:09 AM
Second, interlinkages with the human rights regime point to successful transnational socialization in democratic states. This suggests an overall synergistic relationship between the regimes, when tailormade social interventions on climate change are envisioned.
March 12, 2024 at 9:08 AM
We additionally make sense of the two innovative changes: First, the low-carbon economy discourse seems to be driven by competition in higher income countries. This discursive pathway to a low-carbon transition may open up opportunities for actors pushing for decarbonization.
March 12, 2024 at 9:08 AM
Yet, the formerly strict divide appears to become blurrier in the 2nd NDCs.
Emerging & industrialized economies (Umbrella, EU, BASIC) present plans for green growth.
In contrast, developing countries with lower income (LDCs) emphasize conventional growth plans to combat poverty.
March 12, 2024 at 9:08 AM
When states prioritize some norms over others, this continues to align with the annex divide despite the Paris Agreement’s decreasing differentiation, reflecting differences in domestic circumstances (e.g, vulnerability, income).
March 12, 2024 at 9:08 AM
Overall, countries’ pledges rely on UNFCCC’s norms, indicating the stability of the liberal order.  It thus seems unlikely that radical approaches to climate mitigation will shape policies any time soon.
March 12, 2024 at 9:08 AM
We then link these (inductively identified) topics to the norms derived from the UNFCCC and compare the respective topics of 1st and 2nd NDCs to look for continuity and change.
March 12, 2024 at 9:07 AM
We use quantitative text analysis (topic modeling) to map the topics states address in their 1st and 2nd NDCs. Words that show up together in docs are grouped, allowing us to assign labels based on keywords and a qualitative assessment of texts. #textasdata.
March 12, 2024 at 9:07 AM
We study the changes in how states translate the norms embedded in @UNFCCC in their climate policy pledges, comparing 1st NDCs (from 2015-16) with 2nd NDCs (2020-21).
We find many similarities, but two innovations stand out in the second NDCs: Low-carbon economy & human rights!
March 12, 2024 at 9:06 AM
Yet, the formerly strict divide appears to become blurrier in the 2nd NDCs.
Emerging & industrialized economies (Umbrella, EU, BASIC) present plans for green growth.
In contrast, developing countries with lower income (LDCs) emphasize conventional growth plans to combat poverty.
March 12, 2024 at 9:01 AM
When states prioritize some norms over others, this continues to align with the annex divide despite the Paris Agreement’s decreasing differentiation, reflecting differences in domestic circumstances (e.g, vulnerability, income).
March 12, 2024 at 9:01 AM
Overall, countries’ pledges rely on UNFCCC’s norms, indicating the stability of the liberal order.  It thus seems unlikely that radical approaches to climate mitigation will shape policies any time soon.
March 12, 2024 at 9:00 AM
We then link these (inductively identified) topics to the norms derived from the UNFCCC and compare the respective topics of 1st and 2nd NDCs to look for continuity and change.
March 12, 2024 at 9:00 AM
We use quantitative text analysis (topic modeling) to map the topics states address in their 1st and 2nd NDCs. Words that show up together in docs are grouped, allowing us to assign labels based on keywords and a qualitative assessment of texts. #textasdata.
March 12, 2024 at 8:59 AM