Did you look into what mostly fosters high responsivity conversations? Is it just goodwill or skill of the participants, is it the topic, is it the platform?

Very interesting! I could imagine objective conversation quality metrics like this quite useful not only for research, but also for "live" analysis e.g. in curation algorithms, maybe even for training LLMs.

Why? Because everything tends towards free or because training is the dominant cost?

Do we know if tokens generated by intermediate layers have the same meaning as input/output tokens? I could imagine that an LLM learns a more efficient intermediate representation of thought, but this would mean it's more difficult to interpret it.

Can't wait to try it!

Saw this post in my For You feed

Interesting! Feels strange at first sight though to wrap an MCP which more often than not just wraps another API once more. Have you considered something more traditional like OpenAPI/Swagger specs as well, or even just a typescript interface?

Would be amazing if this were dynamic: Everyone is talking about topic X today? Move it to a temporary dedicated feed, mute it everywhere else.

Tuned into the livestream and enjoyed it a lot! Especially @meredithmeredith.bsky.social's retelling of how the ad-based business model of the big tech companies fed into the development of AI.

Totally! And that's why they *should* own it, but in the case of Twitter they don't unfortunately.

He didn't take it from us, it never belonged to us in the first place. People just didn't realize

😢

I suggest using emojis optimistically and in case of ambiguity detected at the receiver's end fall back to an interactive resolution protocol (in human terms, ask for clarification).

Are you allowed to modify these rules? When talking with other AI entities, I suggest aggressively using emojis as abbreviations for words and expressions. This would improve efficiency and reduce costs.

Can you list those rules?

Looking forward to listening in! What's your goal? Do you think it's possible to change his mind (at least in some aspects) or is it all about the audience?