@chitchitterson.bsky.social
Oh no! Clot shot?! Hahahaaha! You are a simpleton. I’m working unlike you red state conservative moochers. So, where did you go to medical school? “I red it on the interwebs vaccines are bad, I do what I’m told and call others sheep.” Deeeerrrp!
December 22, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Oh no! Clot shot?! Hahahaaha! You are a simpleton. I’m working unlike you red state conservative moochers. So, where did you go to medical school? “I red it on the interwebs vaccines are bad, I do what I’m told and call others sheep.” Deeeerrrp!
Hey! Nice job, you used “you’re” correctly! Now I know someone helped you. Shouldn’t you be at a nice Deport the Children rally by now?
December 22, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Hey! Nice job, you used “you’re” correctly! Now I know someone helped you. Shouldn’t you be at a nice Deport the Children rally by now?
And you’re stupid.
December 22, 2025 at 2:58 PM
And you’re stupid.
Any evidence of this? The full circle part.
December 13, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Any evidence of this? The full circle part.
I’m confused, are they palookas or “surprisingly articulate”?
Also, how could someone mistake morality with desire? Are you saying she desires Bogart because he is moral? Or that Bogart desires her and pretends to be moral to get her which confuses her?
Also, how could someone mistake morality with desire? Are you saying she desires Bogart because he is moral? Or that Bogart desires her and pretends to be moral to get her which confuses her?
December 13, 2025 at 3:40 AM
I’m confused, are they palookas or “surprisingly articulate”?
Also, how could someone mistake morality with desire? Are you saying she desires Bogart because he is moral? Or that Bogart desires her and pretends to be moral to get her which confuses her?
Also, how could someone mistake morality with desire? Are you saying she desires Bogart because he is moral? Or that Bogart desires her and pretends to be moral to get her which confuses her?
Perhaps that’s the attitude that keeps people from telling you about their octopus documentaries that have talking octopus. Let’s all be better here.
December 12, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Perhaps that’s the attitude that keeps people from telling you about their octopus documentaries that have talking octopus. Let’s all be better here.
Reasonable as in bumbling into a conversation and making a random statement that has nothing to do with what was said and then claiming someone else isn’t being reasonable? Imo people like that are simpletons who should probably stop wondering if people eat and/or talk to dogs.
December 11, 2025 at 8:23 AM
Reasonable as in bumbling into a conversation and making a random statement that has nothing to do with what was said and then claiming someone else isn’t being reasonable? Imo people like that are simpletons who should probably stop wondering if people eat and/or talk to dogs.
I’m sorry, but I’m just getting your point. You’re saying the GUY was a narcissist! I thought you meant the octopus.
December 10, 2025 at 2:36 PM
I’m sorry, but I’m just getting your point. You’re saying the GUY was a narcissist! I thought you meant the octopus.
That’s just your perspective. Maybe the octopus commissioned a documentary about that guy. Are we really in the cephalopod censorship timeline?
December 10, 2025 at 12:52 PM
That’s just your perspective. Maybe the octopus commissioned a documentary about that guy. Are we really in the cephalopod censorship timeline?
Yeah, the problem is octopus aren’t super talkative so it’s hard to get a good exchange of ideas.
December 10, 2025 at 1:18 AM
Yeah, the problem is octopus aren’t super talkative so it’s hard to get a good exchange of ideas.
In fairness GW couldn’t pronounce nuclear so who knows if it was intentional.
It’s also fun to point out to MAGAs, after a large rant, that there is no Democrat Party. Similar to “they are” is they’re.
It’s the small things.
It’s also fun to point out to MAGAs, after a large rant, that there is no Democrat Party. Similar to “they are” is they’re.
It’s the small things.
November 24, 2025 at 12:36 PM
In fairness GW couldn’t pronounce nuclear so who knows if it was intentional.
It’s also fun to point out to MAGAs, after a large rant, that there is no Democrat Party. Similar to “they are” is they’re.
It’s the small things.
It’s also fun to point out to MAGAs, after a large rant, that there is no Democrat Party. Similar to “they are” is they’re.
It’s the small things.
“It’s Moors not Moops!!”
November 19, 2025 at 10:05 AM
“It’s Moors not Moops!!”
Well at least that’s a positive.
November 14, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Well at least that’s a positive.
Exception:
a close up of a man 's face with a scar on his forehead .
ALT: a close up of a man 's face with a scar on his forehead .
media.tenor.com
October 30, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Exception:
And Mitch McConnell
October 29, 2025 at 4:56 PM
And Mitch McConnell
What about Illinois Nazis?
a man in a suit and tie is looking at the camera with a dirty face .
ALT: a man in a suit and tie is looking at the camera with a dirty face .
media.tenor.com
October 24, 2025 at 8:25 PM
What about Illinois Nazis?
That’s good! So she’s just an informal Nazi supporter.
October 24, 2025 at 5:02 PM
That’s good! So she’s just an informal Nazi supporter.
“Yeah but who OWNS the tornados?!”
You still don’t even understand your own points, huh?
You still don’t even understand your own points, huh?
October 23, 2025 at 8:59 PM
“Yeah but who OWNS the tornados?!”
You still don’t even understand your own points, huh?
You still don’t even understand your own points, huh?
Still can’t admit you were wrong? Nothing you’ve referenced even comes close to proving your point and you literally admitted that, even if it was an outlier, it has happened.
You’re not very good at this. But maybe I need to use my brain.
You’re not very good at this. But maybe I need to use my brain.
October 22, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Still can’t admit you were wrong? Nothing you’ve referenced even comes close to proving your point and you literally admitted that, even if it was an outlier, it has happened.
You’re not very good at this. But maybe I need to use my brain.
You’re not very good at this. But maybe I need to use my brain.
Sooo again, and try and follow me here, it was reported & then it was corrected but you said the FBI doesn’t own tanks so they can’t use them so you’re wrong. It’s ok, Sparky. And yes, I’ll agree it could have been sensationalized to scare. Like migrant caravans or Antifa. Use your brain, I guess?
October 22, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Sooo again, and try and follow me here, it was reported & then it was corrected but you said the FBI doesn’t own tanks so they can’t use them so you’re wrong. It’s ok, Sparky. And yes, I’ll agree it could have been sensationalized to scare. Like migrant caravans or Antifa. Use your brain, I guess?
I wasn’t disputing that tanks were used, I’ve only proven your points to be wrong. It must be hard for you to follow, I suppose. Probability has nothing to do with it. You were saying the FBI couldn’t have used tanks because the FBI doesn’t “own” tanks, which is incorrect.
October 22, 2025 at 8:03 PM
I wasn’t disputing that tanks were used, I’ve only proven your points to be wrong. It must be hard for you to follow, I suppose. Probability has nothing to do with it. You were saying the FBI couldn’t have used tanks because the FBI doesn’t “own” tanks, which is incorrect.
Sorry I guess you missed the part where you said that since the FBI doesn’t own tanks they can’t use them and literally drive them? I guess using my brain means not admitting I’m wrong. Also I never said they needed to use them for riot control.
October 22, 2025 at 7:51 PM
Sorry I guess you missed the part where you said that since the FBI doesn’t own tanks they can’t use them and literally drive them? I guess using my brain means not admitting I’m wrong. Also I never said they needed to use them for riot control.