It's strange that the story doesn't emphasize affordability. Indian customers pay less than $4/month for 75 GB of 5G data. While it's a large market for AI providers there's no good way to go direct without bundling.

Should not have said "sensitive." A lot of folks don't know how many of their files are shared externally, sensitive or not. Google can make it less aggressive but I would not call it a dark pattern which is a very hideous and malicious way of duping users. There's still a legitimate way to upsell.

There is a baseball crowd and there is a baseball postseason crowd. The latter is large and noticeable.

Carbs in Europe have negative calories

I realized that. We Americans have made up our own world and we love gadgets. So when I saw simpler bikes in Amsterdam I freaked out. It's almost like why all these people are riding such "unsafe" bikes.

Perhaps a less talked about argument is that the robust adoption of the Internet, cloud, and mobile phones is what set the foundation for a rapid growth of AI. Many other tech failed in the past had poor timing. AI, this time around, is well-timed.

Also, not all bikes have external wire brakes. You brake them by pedaling in the opposite direction. I was terrified when I rented a bike and began to bike on busy streets but then it was so much fun afterwards.

I have no evidence to support this but it would be worthwhile to look at increased instant gratification from digital channels compared to reading a book for "fun." Adults look for a reprieve from hardship (labor) and turn to easy solutions. Rise in services delivering fast food is another example.

I always wonder why all call centers don't give customers an option to have an agent call back. It's such an easy thing to do and doesn't cost more. It creates so much goodwill for a company when customers don't have to wait, someone calls them, and their problems are solved.

A couple of questions: 1) If you believe that market is irrational, is there a different company/stock that follows a similar pattern? 2) Is there anything Tesla-specific that might explain this, regardless of whether it is grounded in data or not, other than generic market irrationality?

I don't think people understand what "mathematically" actually means. Reducing prices by 1500% is mathematically possible but the odds of that happening are far lower than the Mariners winning the World Series. You don't have to talk to "experts" and if you do, your experts aren't very good at math.

I'm still hung up on an uppercase 'R' in "Robot."