It's even worse if the video has text on the bottom.

Original photo:

Hehe, you might be onto something. I can think of one more person.

@fossheim.bsky.social
fossheim.photography

Oooh!
Avatar!

Damn, it took me a while.

One thing I mistakenly assumed starting out was that assistive technology only meant screen readers. I wasn't aware of voice commands. Of course this led to some issues with 2.5.3 Label in Name and an overuse of aria-label.

I'm not Dutch (so someone please double check the links) but from my experience I can link you to:

The Digital Accessibility Dashboard
dashboard.digitoegankelijk.nl

Dutch government - list of all organizations, sites and apps
dashboard.digitoegankelijk.nl/zoeken

If it's for the good of the people, of course I'm all for it. I just find it hard to believe we'll ever get to 100% with AI, automation and zero human professional knowledge. Screenshot from the presentation:

I agree the AI generated images were a bad decision. I know we're all aboard the AI train in the dev world, but that doesn't mean the art community feels the same way about it.

They backtracked a bit in the Q&A, saying we still need a professional to check the AI's work and make the final call. But at the same time they said we can achieve 100% automation and zero false positives. Huh? That doesn't make sense if AI isn't always reliable.

Wait, I'm confused about this one, when would it be used?
Isn't the purpose of aria-hidden to hide content from assistive technology only? "Display: none" visually hides as well.

Oh wow! I didn't even notice the ♿ icon at first, I just thought it was the letter "b". It blends in very nicely!

Didn't know about this! Thank you for sharing!