Cheshire Chuck
@cheshirechuck.bsky.social
Friedman/Sowell Economist (PhD), mathematician (PhD) Professor Emeritus Saïd Business School
"You may have noticed that I'm not all there myself".
“But that’s just the trouble with me. I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it.”
"You may have noticed that I'm not all there myself".
“But that’s just the trouble with me. I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it.”
The due process clause of the Constitution only applies to people on American soil. It does not cover non-American narco-terrorists in international waters. There are no international due process guarantees.
December 1, 2025 at 3:37 AM
The due process clause of the Constitution only applies to people on American soil. It does not cover non-American narco-terrorists in international waters. There are no international due process guarantees.
The due process clause of the Constitution only applies to people on American soil. It does not cover narco-terrorists in international waters.
December 1, 2025 at 3:35 AM
The due process clause of the Constitution only applies to people on American soil. It does not cover narco-terrorists in international waters.
Maybe because he was killing American citizens and not narco-terrorists.
December 1, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Maybe because he was killing American citizens and not narco-terrorists.
Your opinion is just that, your opinion. It carries no weight with anyone other than you.
December 1, 2025 at 12:34 AM
Your opinion is just that, your opinion. It carries no weight with anyone other than you.
Or a Democrat politician like Clinton.
December 1, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Or a Democrat politician like Clinton.
In our system, a person does not have to prove their innocence. It is up to the accuser to prove guilt.
December 1, 2025 at 12:29 AM
In our system, a person does not have to prove their innocence. It is up to the accuser to prove guilt.
Obama Apologized for the Drone Killings of Two Western Victims. What About Everyone Else? | ACLU
www.aclu.org
December 1, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Drug trafficking has been a capital offense in the U.S. since the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988.
There was no war declared in Vietnam or Korea; both were police actions implemented by a Presidential decree.
The last time Congress formally declared war was World War II.
There was no war declared in Vietnam or Korea; both were police actions implemented by a Presidential decree.
The last time Congress formally declared war was World War II.
December 1, 2025 at 12:11 AM
Drug trafficking has been a capital offense in the U.S. since the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988.
There was no war declared in Vietnam or Korea; both were police actions implemented by a Presidential decree.
The last time Congress formally declared war was World War II.
There was no war declared in Vietnam or Korea; both were police actions implemented by a Presidential decree.
The last time Congress formally declared war was World War II.
If I have to pick a side, I pick the side fighting to destroy the narco-terrorists.
The narco-terrorists have already killed thousands of people and destroyed the lives of millions of others. Obvious choice.
The narco-terrorists have already killed thousands of people and destroyed the lives of millions of others. Obvious choice.
November 30, 2025 at 11:59 PM
If I have to pick a side, I pick the side fighting to destroy the narco-terrorists.
The narco-terrorists have already killed thousands of people and destroyed the lives of millions of others. Obvious choice.
The narco-terrorists have already killed thousands of people and destroyed the lives of millions of others. Obvious choice.
Don't understand the article.
These tax cuts are already in place. How does extending them raise the debt by $4 trillion? These are not new costs.
The government only collected $4.6 trillion in income taxes in 2024.
The math isn't mathing.
These tax cuts are already in place. How does extending them raise the debt by $4 trillion? These are not new costs.
The government only collected $4.6 trillion in income taxes in 2024.
The math isn't mathing.
November 6, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Don't understand the article.
These tax cuts are already in place. How does extending them raise the debt by $4 trillion? These are not new costs.
The government only collected $4.6 trillion in income taxes in 2024.
The math isn't mathing.
These tax cuts are already in place. How does extending them raise the debt by $4 trillion? These are not new costs.
The government only collected $4.6 trillion in income taxes in 2024.
The math isn't mathing.
The quotes are accurate, but are out of order and out of context, making the ad misleading
The ad edits the quote through selective splicing and reordering, which omits Reagan's pro-tariff context (his own use of duties against Japan).
Here is the full speech
www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/spe...
The ad edits the quote through selective splicing and reordering, which omits Reagan's pro-tariff context (his own use of duties against Japan).
Here is the full speech
www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/spe...
www.reaganlibrary.gov
October 26, 2025 at 5:49 PM
The quotes are accurate, but are out of order and out of context, making the ad misleading
The ad edits the quote through selective splicing and reordering, which omits Reagan's pro-tariff context (his own use of duties against Japan).
Here is the full speech
www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/spe...
The ad edits the quote through selective splicing and reordering, which omits Reagan's pro-tariff context (his own use of duties against Japan).
Here is the full speech
www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/spe...
BS Your statement makes no sense and is impossible.
Total tax Revenue is $4.9 trillion
Individual income taxes, including those of billionaires, account for $2.4 trillion
The top 1% of earners pay 45.8% of the total income tax collected
How can you give a tax break larger than what is collected?
Total tax Revenue is $4.9 trillion
Individual income taxes, including those of billionaires, account for $2.4 trillion
The top 1% of earners pay 45.8% of the total income tax collected
How can you give a tax break larger than what is collected?
October 26, 2025 at 5:19 PM
BS Your statement makes no sense and is impossible.
Total tax Revenue is $4.9 trillion
Individual income taxes, including those of billionaires, account for $2.4 trillion
The top 1% of earners pay 45.8% of the total income tax collected
How can you give a tax break larger than what is collected?
Total tax Revenue is $4.9 trillion
Individual income taxes, including those of billionaires, account for $2.4 trillion
The top 1% of earners pay 45.8% of the total income tax collected
How can you give a tax break larger than what is collected?
What did all of this accomplish?
Nobody's mind was changed.
Last I looked, Trump is still the duly elected President for the next 1,189 days.
Nobody's mind was changed.
Last I looked, Trump is still the duly elected President for the next 1,189 days.
October 19, 2025 at 8:51 PM
What did all of this accomplish?
Nobody's mind was changed.
Last I looked, Trump is still the duly elected President for the next 1,189 days.
Nobody's mind was changed.
Last I looked, Trump is still the duly elected President for the next 1,189 days.
Do you support the armed Hamas gangs going around intimidating civilians in an effort to maintain power?
This is after they agreed to disband as terms of the ceasefire.
This is after they agreed to disband as terms of the ceasefire.
October 19, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Do you support the armed Hamas gangs going around intimidating civilians in an effort to maintain power?
This is after they agreed to disband as terms of the ceasefire.
This is after they agreed to disband as terms of the ceasefire.
That would make sense and help restore some confidence in the media.
October 19, 2025 at 2:18 AM
That would make sense and help restore some confidence in the media.