@chazzstock.bsky.social
Coder, musician and (maybe - one day), author. But that doesn't mean I want to see pointless/boring posts about archaic computers; favourite books; or opinions about who was the greatest guitarist of all time. So stop it!
Laaaaa laaaaa lalala laaa
January 4, 2026 at 9:51 AM
Laaaaa laaaaa lalala laaa
OK, I have more Qs:
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
January 4, 2026 at 9:21 AM
OK, I have more Qs:
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
OK, I have more Qs:
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
January 4, 2026 at 9:17 AM
OK, I have more Qs:
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
What exactly would Trump have to do, to get Starmer's condemnation?
- Try to overthrow an election? Oh!
- Entertain war criminals on US soil? Oh!
- Dismantle democracy in the US? Oh!
Starmer, needs check a few history books. How did it go with appeasing Hitler? Oh!
A couple of questions for our spineless fuckwit of a PM:
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
January 4, 2026 at 9:17 AM
A couple of questions for our spineless fuckwit of a PM:
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
Umm, you obviously haven't been keeping an eye on the news!
January 4, 2026 at 7:57 AM
Umm, you obviously haven't been keeping an eye on the news!
A couple of questions for our spineless fuckwit of a PM:
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
January 4, 2026 at 7:42 AM
A couple of questions for our spineless fuckwit of a PM:
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
1) So, the end justifies the means does it?
2) Have you heard of Neville Chamberlain?
Sorry, I have one more:
3) Do you think we're all fucking stupid? Either, Starmer is buying Trump's BS, or he thinks we'll buy it.
I'll give you a break when you get out of the cult.
January 3, 2026 at 6:34 PM
I'll give you a break when you get out of the cult.
Sorry, I should have kept this simple!
No. We would not be cheering on Obama, (or anyone!), for inserting themselves into the governing of a foreign sovereign state. No matter who that state is. No one, (including Trump), should be getting to decide how things work in another country.
No. We would not be cheering on Obama, (or anyone!), for inserting themselves into the governing of a foreign sovereign state. No matter who that state is. No one, (including Trump), should be getting to decide how things work in another country.
January 3, 2026 at 6:32 PM
Sorry, I should have kept this simple!
No. We would not be cheering on Obama, (or anyone!), for inserting themselves into the governing of a foreign sovereign state. No matter who that state is. No one, (including Trump), should be getting to decide how things work in another country.
No. We would not be cheering on Obama, (or anyone!), for inserting themselves into the governing of a foreign sovereign state. No matter who that state is. No one, (including Trump), should be getting to decide how things work in another country.
If you're kidnapping the leader of a sovereign nation, "congressional approval" is not going to make it any more legal. It's an international war crime regardless of who approves.
January 3, 2026 at 6:11 PM
If you're kidnapping the leader of a sovereign nation, "congressional approval" is not going to make it any more legal. It's an international war crime regardless of who approves.
In fairness...
... that's because he's a shit-for-brains psycho!
... that's because he's a shit-for-brains psycho!
January 3, 2026 at 6:05 PM
In fairness...
... that's because he's a shit-for-brains psycho!
... that's because he's a shit-for-brains psycho!
Don't hold your breath for even a smidgen of condemnation from Starmer. He makes Chamberlain look like a take-no-shit warmonger.
January 3, 2026 at 5:45 PM
Don't hold your breath for even a smidgen of condemnation from Starmer. He makes Chamberlain look like a take-no-shit warmonger.
Umm, yeah!
If Trump cared about arresting international criminals, he would have had Putin in handcuffs the minute he set foot on US soil.
If he cared about stopping drug traffickers, he wouldn't have pardoned the ex-Honduran President.
It's always about the money. ALWAYS.
If Trump cared about arresting international criminals, he would have had Putin in handcuffs the minute he set foot on US soil.
If he cared about stopping drug traffickers, he wouldn't have pardoned the ex-Honduran President.
It's always about the money. ALWAYS.
January 3, 2026 at 5:34 PM
Umm, yeah!
If Trump cared about arresting international criminals, he would have had Putin in handcuffs the minute he set foot on US soil.
If he cared about stopping drug traffickers, he wouldn't have pardoned the ex-Honduran President.
It's always about the money. ALWAYS.
If Trump cared about arresting international criminals, he would have had Putin in handcuffs the minute he set foot on US soil.
If he cared about stopping drug traffickers, he wouldn't have pardoned the ex-Honduran President.
It's always about the money. ALWAYS.
So, we're now at the point where Trump decides who should be running a country, and how it should run.
Isn't that what Hitler thought?
Isn't that what Hitler thought?
January 3, 2026 at 5:23 PM
So, we're now at the point where Trump decides who should be running a country, and how it should run.
Isn't that what Hitler thought?
Isn't that what Hitler thought?
I'm guessing Starmer has already proscribed The USA as a rogue terrorist state. Surely? I mean... this is up there with Palestine Action daubing paint on aeroplanes.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
January 3, 2026 at 12:40 PM
I'm guessing Starmer has already proscribed The USA as a rogue terrorist state. Surely? I mean... this is up there with Palestine Action daubing paint on aeroplanes.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
Re: "If Obama had invaded you'd all be cheering him on".
Nope! See, this is where cult-members get it wrong. They assume we're all in the same brain-washed state. But we can see that the motive for this, was not to help the people, but to acquire assets. That's indefensible no matter who does it.
Nope! See, this is where cult-members get it wrong. They assume we're all in the same brain-washed state. But we can see that the motive for this, was not to help the people, but to acquire assets. That's indefensible no matter who does it.
January 3, 2026 at 12:31 PM
Re: "If Obama had invaded you'd all be cheering him on".
Nope! See, this is where cult-members get it wrong. They assume we're all in the same brain-washed state. But we can see that the motive for this, was not to help the people, but to acquire assets. That's indefensible no matter who does it.
Nope! See, this is where cult-members get it wrong. They assume we're all in the same brain-washed state. But we can see that the motive for this, was not to help the people, but to acquire assets. That's indefensible no matter who does it.
I'm guessing Starmer has already proscribed The USA as a rogue terrorist state. Surely? I mean... this is up there with Palestine Action daubing paint on aeroplanes.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
January 3, 2026 at 12:13 PM
I'm guessing Starmer has already proscribed The USA as a rogue terrorist state. Surely? I mean... this is up there with Palestine Action daubing paint on aeroplanes.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
Haha. No, of course he hasn't. Our spineless fucking PM, is going to keep his head below the parapet, for sure.
To anyone who thought: "thank God 2025 is over". It looks like 2026 is going to be a whole lot worse.
January 3, 2026 at 12:02 PM
To anyone who thought: "thank God 2025 is over". It looks like 2026 is going to be a whole lot worse.