Charleston Hub
@chashub.bsky.social
Charleston Hub is the home of the annual Charleston Conference and Against the Grain for libraries, publishers, and vendors. We're also proud to introduce our latest publication, Katina Magazine: Librarianship Elevated!
Conference hashtag: #chsconf2025
Conference hashtag: #chsconf2025
Oops, accidentally broke the thread. You can find its continuation here 👇
bsky.app/profile/chas... #chsconf2025
bsky.app/profile/chas... #chsconf2025
^All are binding on everybody -- you don't get a choice on whether to obey.
Exec orders are not binding on everyone. They are internal directions from exec branch to itself.
#chsconf2025
Exec orders are not binding on everyone. They are internal directions from exec branch to itself.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Oops, accidentally broke the thread. You can find its continuation here 👇
bsky.app/profile/chas... #chsconf2025
bsky.app/profile/chas... #chsconf2025
That's a wrap! Thanks to in-person speakers Nancy Weiss and Jim O'Donnell (filling in for Ann Okerson) and remote speaker @rosenzweigp.bsky.social #chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 3:20 PM
That's a wrap! Thanks to in-person speakers Nancy Weiss and Jim O'Donnell (filling in for Ann Okerson) and remote speaker @rosenzweigp.bsky.social #chsconf2025
Q: Best case scenario going forward?
A: 1- SCOTUS exercises some restraint on exec. action (e.g. tariff case); 2- results of elections give congress pause and see resurgence of congressional resistance
^ instead of a pendulum
#chsconf2025
A: 1- SCOTUS exercises some restraint on exec. action (e.g. tariff case); 2- results of elections give congress pause and see resurgence of congressional resistance
^ instead of a pendulum
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Q: Best case scenario going forward?
A: 1- SCOTUS exercises some restraint on exec. action (e.g. tariff case); 2- results of elections give congress pause and see resurgence of congressional resistance
^ instead of a pendulum
#chsconf2025
A: 1- SCOTUS exercises some restraint on exec. action (e.g. tariff case); 2- results of elections give congress pause and see resurgence of congressional resistance
^ instead of a pendulum
#chsconf2025
Q: Budget for IMLS approve FY25. In process for 26 budget. Where is the money since Sept?
A: IMLS is closed right now, since Oct 1, with the FY. Agencies that are operating may have money from various processes -- e.g. fees, donated funds.
#chsconf2025
A: IMLS is closed right now, since Oct 1, with the FY. Agencies that are operating may have money from various processes -- e.g. fees, donated funds.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Q: Budget for IMLS approve FY25. In process for 26 budget. Where is the money since Sept?
A: IMLS is closed right now, since Oct 1, with the FY. Agencies that are operating may have money from various processes -- e.g. fees, donated funds.
#chsconf2025
A: IMLS is closed right now, since Oct 1, with the FY. Agencies that are operating may have money from various processes -- e.g. fees, donated funds.
#chsconf2025
Q: We're talking about dismantling. What does "mantling" look like?
A: You can't "mantle" as readily as you can dismantle. Only holds as long as the party in power wants to "mantle."
#chsconf2025
A: You can't "mantle" as readily as you can dismantle. Only holds as long as the party in power wants to "mantle."
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 3:06 PM
Q: We're talking about dismantling. What does "mantling" look like?
A: You can't "mantle" as readily as you can dismantle. Only holds as long as the party in power wants to "mantle."
#chsconf2025
A: You can't "mantle" as readily as you can dismantle. Only holds as long as the party in power wants to "mantle."
#chsconf2025
Q: What constrains "capriciousness"?
A: Have you thought about, analyzed and documented why you did something? Need to have a rational basis, explanation, record of how you're making a decision.
Typically, take more time - taking public comment, responding, explaining.
#chsconf2025
A: Have you thought about, analyzed and documented why you did something? Need to have a rational basis, explanation, record of how you're making a decision.
Typically, take more time - taking public comment, responding, explaining.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Q: What constrains "capriciousness"?
A: Have you thought about, analyzed and documented why you did something? Need to have a rational basis, explanation, record of how you're making a decision.
Typically, take more time - taking public comment, responding, explaining.
#chsconf2025
A: Have you thought about, analyzed and documented why you did something? Need to have a rational basis, explanation, record of how you're making a decision.
Typically, take more time - taking public comment, responding, explaining.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Going through cases:
-State of Rhode Island v. Trump (ongoing)
-ALA v. Sonderling (paused during shutdown)
#chsconf2025
-State of Rhode Island v. Trump (ongoing)
-ALA v. Sonderling (paused during shutdown)
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Going through cases:
-State of Rhode Island v. Trump (ongoing)
-ALA v. Sonderling (paused during shutdown)
#chsconf2025
-State of Rhode Island v. Trump (ongoing)
-ALA v. Sonderling (paused during shutdown)
#chsconf2025
To understand lawsuits, need to know a few legal concepts:
-Separation of powers (Congress writes laws; exec implements them)
-Congress has power of the purse
-President is subject to "take care" clause
-Administrative procedure act (can't be arbitrary and capricious)
-Tucker act
#chsconf2025
-Separation of powers (Congress writes laws; exec implements them)
-Congress has power of the purse
-President is subject to "take care" clause
-Administrative procedure act (can't be arbitrary and capricious)
-Tucker act
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:49 PM
To understand lawsuits, need to know a few legal concepts:
-Separation of powers (Congress writes laws; exec implements them)
-Congress has power of the purse
-President is subject to "take care" clause
-Administrative procedure act (can't be arbitrary and capricious)
-Tucker act
#chsconf2025
-Separation of powers (Congress writes laws; exec implements them)
-Congress has power of the purse
-President is subject to "take care" clause
-Administrative procedure act (can't be arbitrary and capricious)
-Tucker act
#chsconf2025
What is the Institute of Museum and Library Services?
IMLS, by legislation, is an "independent" agency. Not a cabinet or department -- reports to the president. A tiny agency with a big mission.
#chsconf2025
IMLS, by legislation, is an "independent" agency. Not a cabinet or department -- reports to the president. A tiny agency with a big mission.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:42 PM
What is the Institute of Museum and Library Services?
IMLS, by legislation, is an "independent" agency. Not a cabinet or department -- reports to the president. A tiny agency with a big mission.
#chsconf2025
IMLS, by legislation, is an "independent" agency. Not a cabinet or department -- reports to the president. A tiny agency with a big mission.
#chsconf2025
There have been previous EOs, e.g. Executive Order 14084, "Advancing the Arts, the Humanities, and Museum and Library Services"
But 14238 was different.
#chsconf2025
But 14238 was different.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:39 PM
There have been previous EOs, e.g. Executive Order 14084, "Advancing the Arts, the Humanities, and Museum and Library Services"
But 14238 was different.
#chsconf2025
But 14238 was different.
#chsconf2025
Next speaker, Nancy Weiss, is talking through a case study: Executive Order 14238 and the Institute of Museum and Library Services
#chsconf2025
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Next speaker, Nancy Weiss, is talking through a case study: Executive Order 14238 and the Institute of Museum and Library Services
#chsconf2025
#chsconf2025
Reactions:
-Congress has seemingly acquiesced (not asserted power of purse; recess for 7 weeks)
-Courts: Mixed bag (lower = more willing to restrict; SCOTUS has not yet substantively restricted)
-Public popularity: ???
#chsconf2025
-Congress has seemingly acquiesced (not asserted power of purse; recess for 7 weeks)
-Courts: Mixed bag (lower = more willing to restrict; SCOTUS has not yet substantively restricted)
-Public popularity: ???
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Reactions:
-Congress has seemingly acquiesced (not asserted power of purse; recess for 7 weeks)
-Courts: Mixed bag (lower = more willing to restrict; SCOTUS has not yet substantively restricted)
-Public popularity: ???
#chsconf2025
-Congress has seemingly acquiesced (not asserted power of purse; recess for 7 weeks)
-Courts: Mixed bag (lower = more willing to restrict; SCOTUS has not yet substantively restricted)
-Public popularity: ???
#chsconf2025
Executive orders under Trump:
1. Policy choices (e.g. rescind gender ID choice on passport)
2. Firings (e.g. FTC/Federal Reserve)
3. Structural restrictions (e.g. USAID & Dept of Ed)
#chsfonc2025
1. Policy choices (e.g. rescind gender ID choice on passport)
2. Firings (e.g. FTC/Federal Reserve)
3. Structural restrictions (e.g. USAID & Dept of Ed)
#chsfonc2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Executive orders under Trump:
1. Policy choices (e.g. rescind gender ID choice on passport)
2. Firings (e.g. FTC/Federal Reserve)
3. Structural restrictions (e.g. USAID & Dept of Ed)
#chsfonc2025
1. Policy choices (e.g. rescind gender ID choice on passport)
2. Firings (e.g. FTC/Federal Reserve)
3. Structural restrictions (e.g. USAID & Dept of Ed)
#chsfonc2025
A close cousin of executive orders = presidential declarations. They allow for invocation of other emergency authorities. E.g. Tariff case pending with SCOTUS
Theme = deference to executive authority.
#chsconf2025
Theme = deference to executive authority.
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:27 PM
A close cousin of executive orders = presidential declarations. They allow for invocation of other emergency authorities. E.g. Tariff case pending with SCOTUS
Theme = deference to executive authority.
#chsconf2025
Theme = deference to executive authority.
#chsconf2025
More recently, SCOTUS has embraced the theory. Current case in front of SCOTUS -- Trump v. Slaughter -- on FTC independence. #chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:25 PM
More recently, SCOTUS has embraced the theory. Current case in front of SCOTUS -- Trump v. Slaughter -- on FTC independence. #chsconf2025
New Deal "broke" that theory with creation of FTC, Fed Reserve, etc. -- and SCOTUS rejected the theory in the 1930s.
#chsconf2025
#chsconf2025
November 7, 2025 at 2:24 PM
New Deal "broke" that theory with creation of FTC, Fed Reserve, etc. -- and SCOTUS rejected the theory in the 1930s.
#chsconf2025
#chsconf2025