Of course it is Ruth van Holst! Sorry for the typo

Robert Heirene, @lucas-palmer.bsky.social, @joelbillieux.bsky.social, Beata Bothe, Damien Brevers, @zhangchen.bsky.social, @joshuagrubbsphd.bsky.social, Anja Kräplin, Karol Lewczuk, Philip Newall, @jcesarpl.bsky.social, @peterslab.bsky.social, Ruth can Holst and @lukeclark.bsky.social

💡 What’s next:
🤝 Collaboration between individuals, institutions & societies
📚 Knowledge transfer

🎯 Goal: an inclusive & fair open science culture that strengthens trust and reliability in research.

⏳ Across the board:
➡️ Positive towards open science
➡️ Need more time
➡️ Need more resources
➡️ Need more institutional support
➡️ Need more training

👩‍🔬 Early-career researchers (ECRs):
✨ Put higher importance on open science than the more senior counterparts
😟 Feel they lack knowledge & fear making mistakes

🧑‍🏫 More senior researchers:
📈 Highlight increased workload
💸 Point to weak incentives

Personal opinion: description of anything in the method section should not be shortened and put in supp. These are the crucial details that make it transparent and facilitate replication.

My poster can be found here: osf.io/2d6hc