Charles Tellier
@charlestellier.bsky.social
Civil servant. Diplomat at French MFA, working on UN Ocean conference UNOC3. Formerly with: DFID, World Bank, AFD, IFAD. My heart is in Africa. #SaveourOcean
Reposted by Charles Tellier
Have you noticed more lies about #COP30 in your feed?
Research shows social media platforms are driving the spread of climate disinformation, amplifying false content to maximise engagement and ad revenue.
Our new ananlysis reveals that this breaches the EU Digital Services Act. ⬇️
Research shows social media platforms are driving the spread of climate disinformation, amplifying false content to maximise engagement and ad revenue.
Our new ananlysis reveals that this breaches the EU Digital Services Act. ⬇️
Digital Distortion: How social media platforms are driving climate disinformation in Europe and beyond | ClientEarth
Did you notice a lot of climate lies in your feed recently? Research shows that social media platforms are incentivising and amplifying climate disinformation - to chase ad revenue.
www.clientearth.org
November 12, 2025 at 9:34 AM
Have you noticed more lies about #COP30 in your feed?
Research shows social media platforms are driving the spread of climate disinformation, amplifying false content to maximise engagement and ad revenue.
Our new ananlysis reveals that this breaches the EU Digital Services Act. ⬇️
Research shows social media platforms are driving the spread of climate disinformation, amplifying false content to maximise engagement and ad revenue.
Our new ananlysis reveals that this breaches the EU Digital Services Act. ⬇️
Reposted by Charles Tellier
Contribuer à l'avancement du fascisme, c'est normaliser la parole de qqn qui veut abolir les droits de l'homme et l'égalité devant la justice.
Rendez vous compte du rôle que vous jouez dans ce démantèlement de la République.
Rendez vous compte du rôle que vous jouez dans ce démantèlement de la République.
a man in a suit and tie is talking to a woman and says " we need to wake them up "
ALT: a man in a suit and tie is talking to a woman and says " we need to wake them up "
media.tenor.com
September 29, 2025 at 10:15 AM
Contribuer à l'avancement du fascisme, c'est normaliser la parole de qqn qui veut abolir les droits de l'homme et l'égalité devant la justice.
Rendez vous compte du rôle que vous jouez dans ce démantèlement de la République.
Rendez vous compte du rôle que vous jouez dans ce démantèlement de la République.
Reposted by Charles Tellier
Bottom line:
No - accommodation *does not* help social democratic parties.
Yes, it *does* hurt them.
No - accommodation *does not* help social democratic parties.
Yes, it *does* hurt them.
September 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Bottom line:
No - accommodation *does not* help social democratic parties.
Yes, it *does* hurt them.
No - accommodation *does not* help social democratic parties.
Yes, it *does* hurt them.
Reposted by Charles Tellier
The takeaway:
👉 Accommodating the radical right on immigration doesn’t win back voters.
👉 It alienates the progressive base.
👉 And it raises the salience of the very issue the radical right owns.
In short: it’s electoral self-harm.
👉 Accommodating the radical right on immigration doesn’t win back voters.
👉 It alienates the progressive base.
👉 And it raises the salience of the very issue the radical right owns.
In short: it’s electoral self-harm.
September 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
The takeaway:
👉 Accommodating the radical right on immigration doesn’t win back voters.
👉 It alienates the progressive base.
👉 And it raises the salience of the very issue the radical right owns.
In short: it’s electoral self-harm.
👉 Accommodating the radical right on immigration doesn’t win back voters.
👉 It alienates the progressive base.
👉 And it raises the salience of the very issue the radical right owns.
In short: it’s electoral self-harm.
Reposted by Charles Tellier
If the objective was to win support and squash the electoral chances of Reform UK, then the strategy had the opposite effects.
❌ Labour’s vote intentions dropped
❌ Reform UK vote intentions unchanged (or at worse better)
❌ Labour’s vote intentions dropped
❌ Reform UK vote intentions unchanged (or at worse better)
September 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
If the objective was to win support and squash the electoral chances of Reform UK, then the strategy had the opposite effects.
❌ Labour’s vote intentions dropped
❌ Reform UK vote intentions unchanged (or at worse better)
❌ Labour’s vote intentions dropped
❌ Reform UK vote intentions unchanged (or at worse better)
Reposted by Charles Tellier
If the objective of being tough on immigration was for Labour to be perceived as more right-wing & nativist, the strategy worked.
❌ Labour was seen as more anti-immigration & more right-wing
❌Immigration became more salient as an issue
❌ But Labour’s perceived competence on immigration fell.
❌ Labour was seen as more anti-immigration & more right-wing
❌Immigration became more salient as an issue
❌ But Labour’s perceived competence on immigration fell.
September 5, 2025 at 6:50 AM
If the objective of being tough on immigration was for Labour to be perceived as more right-wing & nativist, the strategy worked.
❌ Labour was seen as more anti-immigration & more right-wing
❌Immigration became more salient as an issue
❌ But Labour’s perceived competence on immigration fell.
❌ Labour was seen as more anti-immigration & more right-wing
❌Immigration became more salient as an issue
❌ But Labour’s perceived competence on immigration fell.