Clifton
@chamiltochem.bsky.social
Pharmaceutical scientist and political leftist
Free Palestine
Free Palestine
The addition of the buying milk was superfluous. But maybe your deductive skills aren’t quite as advanced as your social skills- though I feel you might be overestimating them as well.
December 3, 2025 at 1:55 AM
The addition of the buying milk was superfluous. But maybe your deductive skills aren’t quite as advanced as your social skills- though I feel you might be overestimating them as well.
Have you ever heard of this thing called “context?” The entire conversation is around news articles writing stories that give the impression people in the pictures are doing embarrassing or awful things they aren’t actually doing.
That’s how I knew you weren’t actually calling yourself a hoodlum.
That’s how I knew you weren’t actually calling yourself a hoodlum.
December 3, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Have you ever heard of this thing called “context?” The entire conversation is around news articles writing stories that give the impression people in the pictures are doing embarrassing or awful things they aren’t actually doing.
That’s how I knew you weren’t actually calling yourself a hoodlum.
That’s how I knew you weren’t actually calling yourself a hoodlum.
This was a joke based on the linked article, but the insanity of the internet apparently requires it to be labeled with /s or people take it seriously.
November 29, 2025 at 2:57 PM
This was a joke based on the linked article, but the insanity of the internet apparently requires it to be labeled with /s or people take it seriously.
Dude, you were pulling down your trousers and shitting on the sidewalk in the middle of the day?
Trying to downplay that as just “day drinking” is absurd.
Trying to downplay that as just “day drinking” is absurd.
November 29, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Dude, you were pulling down your trousers and shitting on the sidewalk in the middle of the day?
Trying to downplay that as just “day drinking” is absurd.
Trying to downplay that as just “day drinking” is absurd.
All this from the guy who says he knows nothing about the people he’s pardoned.
November 29, 2025 at 3:56 AM
All this from the guy who says he knows nothing about the people he’s pardoned.
And moderate trash goblins actually condemned them for holding trump accountable for his illegal election activities.
November 26, 2025 at 10:24 PM
And moderate trash goblins actually condemned them for holding trump accountable for his illegal election activities.
Cool story: the Supreme Court literally ruled trump was immune from prosecution for anything related to his job as president, and both Kamala and Biden rolled out doing anything to change the court…
So… no… only progressive New York State actually managed to prosecute and convict trump,
1/2
So… no… only progressive New York State actually managed to prosecute and convict trump,
1/2
November 26, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Cool story: the Supreme Court literally ruled trump was immune from prosecution for anything related to his job as president, and both Kamala and Biden rolled out doing anything to change the court…
So… no… only progressive New York State actually managed to prosecute and convict trump,
1/2
So… no… only progressive New York State actually managed to prosecute and convict trump,
1/2
It’s weird how you blame random people that largely voted for Kamala Harris instead of the democratic establishment that backed Biden until her literally couldn’t complete a sentence during the debate, and spent hundreds of millions unseating progressives in the primaries.
November 26, 2025 at 10:19 PM
It’s weird how you blame random people that largely voted for Kamala Harris instead of the democratic establishment that backed Biden until her literally couldn’t complete a sentence during the debate, and spent hundreds of millions unseating progressives in the primaries.
Reposted by Clifton
Pedophile…hebephile…ephebophile…The Chippy 5000 does not discriminate.
November 19, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Pedophile…hebephile…ephebophile…The Chippy 5000 does not discriminate.
No. I don’t. I read it. I responded to it. It’s still just as dumb as the first time I responded to it. You’ve added no context to make it less dumb. Maybe you should read your first post, where you yourself say you didn’t even read her comments and are just blindly making excuses for her?
Bye
Bye
November 19, 2025 at 7:55 PM
No. I don’t. I read it. I responded to it. It’s still just as dumb as the first time I responded to it. You’ve added no context to make it less dumb. Maybe you should read your first post, where you yourself say you didn’t even read her comments and are just blindly making excuses for her?
Bye
Bye
Bigotry makes a lot more sense than voting for a sexual predator because he’s the only one you think will hold sexual predators accountable. That’s not reasonable on any level.
November 19, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Bigotry makes a lot more sense than voting for a sexual predator because he’s the only one you think will hold sexual predators accountable. That’s not reasonable on any level.
And why exactly would you have no faith in the prosecutor that actually convicted a bunch of sexual predators? And as a legislator introduced legislation to go after sexual predators?
I’m not going to ignore reality in order to excuse someone’s bigotry.
I’m not going to ignore reality in order to excuse someone’s bigotry.
November 19, 2025 at 7:40 PM
And why exactly would you have no faith in the prosecutor that actually convicted a bunch of sexual predators? And as a legislator introduced legislation to go after sexual predators?
I’m not going to ignore reality in order to excuse someone’s bigotry.
I’m not going to ignore reality in order to excuse someone’s bigotry.
Why would he give you hope? Was it him bragging about sexual assault? Was it him being found civilly liable of sexual assault? Was it the more than 2 dozen other women that credibly accused him? Was it him not actually saying he would release the Epstein files?
November 19, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Why would he give you hope? Was it him bragging about sexual assault? Was it him being found civilly liable of sexual assault? Was it the more than 2 dozen other women that credibly accused him? Was it him not actually saying he would release the Epstein files?
So no… I’m giving her no slack because she for some reason got swindled by saying he would “declassify the jfk and mlk files, ‘less so’ declassify the Epstein files.”
In part because what the fuck does “less so declassify” mean?
In part because what the fuck does “less so declassify” mean?
November 19, 2025 at 7:23 PM
So no… I’m giving her no slack because she for some reason got swindled by saying he would “declassify the jfk and mlk files, ‘less so’ declassify the Epstein files.”
In part because what the fuck does “less so declassify” mean?
In part because what the fuck does “less so declassify” mean?
Things in there and he wouldn’t want to hurt innocent people… so qualified it with “less so.” On the other hand, literally no one asked Harris about the Epstein files. No. One.
Oh yeah, and trump literally appointed the guy responsible for the sweetheart Epstein deal to a position in his cabinet…
Oh yeah, and trump literally appointed the guy responsible for the sweetheart Epstein deal to a position in his cabinet…
November 19, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Things in there and he wouldn’t want to hurt innocent people… so qualified it with “less so.” On the other hand, literally no one asked Harris about the Epstein files. No. One.
Oh yeah, and trump literally appointed the guy responsible for the sweetheart Epstein deal to a position in his cabinet…
Oh yeah, and trump literally appointed the guy responsible for the sweetheart Epstein deal to a position in his cabinet…
Trump has been found civilly liable for sexual assault, has been credibly accused by dozens of women, has been recorded bragging about sexually assaulting multiple women, and in the same interview he sort of said he would release the Epstein file, also wavered and said there’s a lot of phony…
November 19, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Trump has been found civilly liable for sexual assault, has been credibly accused by dozens of women, has been recorded bragging about sexually assaulting multiple women, and in the same interview he sort of said he would release the Epstein file, also wavered and said there’s a lot of phony…
Some of the senators involved were democrats before the 1960s, and participated in the filibuster as democrats. Every state they represented became reliably red after the civil rights act was passed.
November 19, 2025 at 4:27 AM
Some of the senators involved were democrats before the 1960s, and participated in the filibuster as democrats. Every state they represented became reliably red after the civil rights act was passed.
The Republican Party he knew was still the party of Ronald Reagan’s “time for choosing,” Barry Goldwater’s “southern strategy,” the filibuster of the civil rights act, redlining, and Reagan’s “Cadillac welfare queen.”
They weren’t exactly subtle about their bigotry before.
They weren’t exactly subtle about their bigotry before.
November 19, 2025 at 4:27 AM
The Republican Party he knew was still the party of Ronald Reagan’s “time for choosing,” Barry Goldwater’s “southern strategy,” the filibuster of the civil rights act, redlining, and Reagan’s “Cadillac welfare queen.”
They weren’t exactly subtle about their bigotry before.
They weren’t exactly subtle about their bigotry before.
It also is just linguistically correct to do so- you don’t have to be a white supremacist to be a racist, you just have to actively support and participate in racism.
November 19, 2025 at 4:15 AM
It also is just linguistically correct to do so- you don’t have to be a white supremacist to be a racist, you just have to actively support and participate in racism.
“I’m not a racist, I just voted for a racist that I knew would enact racist policies because he promised me a 2% tax break.”
I’m gonna shorthand people that actively support racism but for non-racist reasons as racists. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
I’m gonna shorthand people that actively support racism but for non-racist reasons as racists. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
November 19, 2025 at 4:15 AM
“I’m not a racist, I just voted for a racist that I knew would enact racist policies because he promised me a 2% tax break.”
I’m gonna shorthand people that actively support racism but for non-racist reasons as racists. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
I’m gonna shorthand people that actively support racism but for non-racist reasons as racists. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.