it is not open, it is not fair, it is controlled by billionaires and corporations, and their goals are not aligned with the interests of humanity.

Et puis entre JLM Faure Roussel Hollande et compagnie ça exploserait tellement le peu d’unité que le NFP a pu trouver 🫠

Toutes les décisions de Macron sont faites dans l’objectif de conserver ou gagner du pouvoir donc j’ai du mal à voir le cheminement

J’ai changé 🤓🤓

As I said, they don’t put it in proposals because it’s so impopular. But they vote the most anti social laws in parliament all the time.

www.humanite.fr/politique/ma...

www.nouvelobs.com/politique/20...

theconversation.com/le-programme...

They do, and every vote they cast in parliament along with Macron’s neoliberals proves it, but they don’t dare advertise it in public yet because it’s just so impopular

Oh so basically you don’t understand the notion of consent! That makes more sense!

But I’ll agree that it’s unproductive to exchange with someone that acts in such bad faith. Ignoring half my replies doesn’t make them disappear, and saying that a policy is unenforceable doesn’t make it go away either.

I live in the EU, I think you’ll find my online rights are very much backed by the GDPR.

Coming back to the comparison with open source code; when a code base that’s available on the internet doesn’t have an explicit license, it is assumed it’s All Rights Reserved. The same thing applies here. No explicit consent, no right to export my data.

I certainly do have a right to say what can be done with my data.

Collecting data from users without their consent is a practice of centralised networks and predatory corporations. I thought Bsky was supposed to be better than that, but oh well, looks like that didn’t last

Ah yes, that’s how licenses works. They only apply to content when you *don’t* have access to it. Sure.

“Hi all!

From now on, all the posts will have rat cum in them. If you *don't* want rat cum in your timeline, simply put the hashtag #noratcumpls in your bio.”