Science grows through failure as much as success. In our first Trial & Error Symposium we explored how to make openness, uncertainty, and null results part of research culture.

Read the full recap here:
blog.trialanderror.org/trial-and-er...

Science is said to ‘self-correct’. But who is this ‘self’?

As Sergio Sismondo shows, correction isn’t neat - it’s shaped by pharma interests, politics, and media. Read the new Cultures of Trial and Error post here: blog.trialanderror.org/self-correct...

When science goes wrong, who fixes it?
Melpomeni Antonakaki traces Japan’s bioscience scandals (2006–2014) to show how “engines of science correction” can lead to bold reform and increase accountability - or grind to a halt.

Read more:
blog.trialanderror.org/engines-of-s...

When science goes wrong, who fixes it?

Melpomeni Antonakaki traces Japan’s bioscience scandals (2006–2014) to show how “engines of science correction” can lead to bold reform and increase accountability - or grind to a halt. Read more: blog.trialanderror.org/engines_of_s...

Science is said to be self-correcting, but in practice it takes many forms

Our Cultures of Trial and Error series has explored replication crises, the metascience movement, radical openness, and even hoaxes, each revealing a different path to correction

Read: blog.trialanderror.org/blog/culture...