Centerish Dad
@centerishdad.bsky.social
Mid-life, middle class/middle way, drives on the left, neurodirverse
UK born & resident, (mainly liberal, never Tory, never communist)
optimist, realist, socialist, democrat, republican & constitutional monarchist, pragmatist, internationalist, & humanist
UK born & resident, (mainly liberal, never Tory, never communist)
optimist, realist, socialist, democrat, republican & constitutional monarchist, pragmatist, internationalist, & humanist
@sarahviktoria.bsky.social
They looked at use of woman (& man) in the EA as that was the issue of the Scots appeal
They looked at both interpretations in the whole EA to see which made most sense.
So IMO, the SC judgement was a legal not a value one.
But the EHRC guidelines are more value ridden
They looked at use of woman (& man) in the EA as that was the issue of the Scots appeal
They looked at both interpretations in the whole EA to see which made most sense.
So IMO, the SC judgement was a legal not a value one.
But the EHRC guidelines are more value ridden
April 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM
@sarahviktoria.bsky.social
They looked at use of woman (& man) in the EA as that was the issue of the Scots appeal
They looked at both interpretations in the whole EA to see which made most sense.
So IMO, the SC judgement was a legal not a value one.
But the EHRC guidelines are more value ridden
They looked at use of woman (& man) in the EA as that was the issue of the Scots appeal
They looked at both interpretations in the whole EA to see which made most sense.
So IMO, the SC judgement was a legal not a value one.
But the EHRC guidelines are more value ridden