Then it gives the authors of said paper more space & airtime to continue to defend their problematic position & allowed the rehashing of problematic & unethical arguments in the face of an ongoing genocide. This is as a colleague & friend observes is an eg of epistemic injustice. Shame on LJIL 3/3

The paper published did not meet the threshold of retraction under COPE guidelines (pls find guidance on publishing during genocide) plus the excuse of an editor not paying attention to world events due to high workload (maybe reconsider editing an IL journal) 1/3

We muse about the state of British catering & obsessions over the weather & collectively complain about the state of collapsing infrastructure & obscenely expensive train journeys. To my fellow strangers on this island, cheers 🍻 We are better than Starmer (& Powell) 2/2

Massive congrats to @bambosmp.bsky.social for an excellent debate in Parliament just now on debt cancellation and to the drafters of the bill @kpatricio.bsky.social, Stephen Connelly and @celinetan.bsky.social

Much more to be done, but justice is certainly around the corner.

#CancelTheDebt

PS: they also keep me in my job. Maybe those academics moaning about int students who pay their wages should think about reframing their pedagogical lens to accommodate the diversity of their cohorts. This is where (for the left), the theory of decolonising the curriculum should come into practice.