Ceist
@ceist.bsky.social
Debunking fake graphs/memes & disinformation about human-caused global warming & climate change for the last 20 years.
Australian.
#ClimateChange
#ClimateCrisis
https://x.com/Ceist8
Australian.
#ClimateChange
#ClimateCrisis
https://x.com/Ceist8
What Elon did at the inauguration was a clearly Nazi salute. He knew it would get everyone talking about him. He loves the attention.
This was a "from the heart" gesture by Elon:
This was a "from the heart" gesture by Elon:
January 24, 2025 at 1:41 PM
What Elon did at the inauguration was a clearly Nazi salute. He knew it would get everyone talking about him. He loves the attention.
This was a "from the heart" gesture by Elon:
This was a "from the heart" gesture by Elon:
Only ignorant people "consider it debunked"
Old video but a funny one
Old video but a funny one
January 24, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Only ignorant people "consider it debunked"
Old video but a funny one
Old video but a funny one
Yes, it was so obviously the Nazi salute.
This video bekow shows Elon's gesture of "throwing his heart out" to the crowd.
He knows the difference
This video bekow shows Elon's gesture of "throwing his heart out" to the crowd.
He knows the difference
January 23, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Yes, it was so obviously the Nazi salute.
This video bekow shows Elon's gesture of "throwing his heart out" to the crowd.
He knows the difference
This video bekow shows Elon's gesture of "throwing his heart out" to the crowd.
He knows the difference
Maybe Elon had a heart once. He knows the difference in gestures
January 23, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Maybe Elon had a heart once. He knows the difference in gestures
Not the same gesture. Watch the videos, not sphotos.
January 23, 2025 at 11:38 PM
Not the same gesture. Watch the videos, not sphotos.
This was Elon's gesture for "my heart goes out to you".
Not the same as his Nazi salute. He knows the difference.
Not the same as his Nazi salute. He knows the difference.
January 23, 2025 at 11:36 PM
This was Elon's gesture for "my heart goes out to you".
Not the same as his Nazi salute. He knows the difference.
Not the same as his Nazi salute. He knows the difference.
Here are the video clips. Obviously not the same thing
January 23, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Here are the video clips. Obviously not the same thing
Watch the videos. Not the same thing.
January 23, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Watch the videos. Not the same thing.
Watch the videos instead of the photos.
They are obviously not the same thing
They are obviously not the same thing
January 23, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Watch the videos instead of the photos.
They are obviously not the same thing
They are obviously not the same thing
You're just repeating easily refuted ignorant science-illiterate nonsense.
Time wasting troll. Bye.
Time wasting troll. Bye.
January 7, 2025 at 10:28 PM
You're just repeating easily refuted ignorant science-illiterate nonsense.
Time wasting troll. Bye.
Time wasting troll. Bye.
Nutty Ned Nikolov?
Who can forget these gems 😂
Who can forget these gems 😂
January 7, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Nutty Ned Nikolov?
Who can forget these gems 😂
Who can forget these gems 😂
I think someone else created that WUWT account. 😂
December 14, 2024 at 11:33 PM
I think someone else created that WUWT account. 😂
6/ Scotese et al 2021/2022
"CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has played an important, if not the predominant role, in regulating the Earth’s temperature through time"
sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
agu.confex.com/agu/fm22/mee...
"CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has played an important, if not the predominant role, in regulating the Earth’s temperature through time"
sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
agu.confex.com/agu/fm22/mee...
December 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM
6/ Scotese et al 2021/2022
"CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has played an important, if not the predominant role, in regulating the Earth’s temperature through time"
sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
agu.confex.com/agu/fm22/mee...
"CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has played an important, if not the predominant role, in regulating the Earth’s temperature through time"
sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
agu.confex.com/agu/fm22/mee...
5/ Heib also disregarded other factors from Berner et al 2001
"Factors considered that affect temperature are the evolution of the sun, the atmospheric greenhouse effect (relating temperature to CO2), and changes in paleogeography"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
"Factors considered that affect temperature are the evolution of the sun, the atmospheric greenhouse effect (relating temperature to CO2), and changes in paleogeography"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
December 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM
5/ Heib also disregarded other factors from Berner et al 2001
"Factors considered that affect temperature are the evolution of the sun, the atmospheric greenhouse effect (relating temperature to CO2), and changes in paleogeography"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
"Factors considered that affect temperature are the evolution of the sun, the atmospheric greenhouse effect (relating temperature to CO2), and changes in paleogeography"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
4/ Heib dishonestly & incompetently overlaid the old GEOCARB III CO2 plot from Berner et al 2001 with Scotese's old hand drawn plot of broad "hot and cold" periods, with no regard at all for correlating the time periods (which were over tens of millions of years).
December 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM
4/ Heib dishonestly & incompetently overlaid the old GEOCARB III CO2 plot from Berner et al 2001 with Scotese's old hand drawn plot of broad "hot and cold" periods, with no regard at all for correlating the time periods (which were over tens of millions of years).
3/ Heib copied the "temperature" plot from an out-dated hand drawn schematic on Scotese's old website
scotese.com/climate.htm
It's NOT based on ANY proxy temperature data.
It was just very broadly estimated hot & cold periods over millions of years.
scotese.com/climate.htm
It's NOT based on ANY proxy temperature data.
It was just very broadly estimated hot & cold periods over millions of years.
December 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM
3/ Heib copied the "temperature" plot from an out-dated hand drawn schematic on Scotese's old website
scotese.com/climate.htm
It's NOT based on ANY proxy temperature data.
It was just very broadly estimated hot & cold periods over millions of years.
scotese.com/climate.htm
It's NOT based on ANY proxy temperature data.
It was just very broadly estimated hot & cold periods over millions of years.
2/ Berner et al 2001 actually REFUTES the claim that there is "no correlation"
"there is indeed a correlation between CO2 and paleotemperature, as manifested by the atmospheric greenhouse effect"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/6157...
"there is indeed a correlation between CO2 and paleotemperature, as manifested by the atmospheric greenhouse effect"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/6157...
December 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM
2/ Berner et al 2001 actually REFUTES the claim that there is "no correlation"
"there is indeed a correlation between CO2 and paleotemperature, as manifested by the atmospheric greenhouse effect"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/6157...
"there is indeed a correlation between CO2 and paleotemperature, as manifested by the atmospheric greenhouse effect"
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/6157...
Your graph is an old fake. It's from Monte Heib's (mining engineer) blog
1. Heib's badly plotted graph cites 2 sources:
(CO2 plot) Berner et al 2001
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
("Temperature" plot) Scotese's old website:
scotese.com/climate.htm
1. Heib's badly plotted graph cites 2 sources:
(CO2 plot) Berner et al 2001
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
("Temperature" plot) Scotese's old website:
scotese.com/climate.htm
December 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM
Your graph is an old fake. It's from Monte Heib's (mining engineer) blog
1. Heib's badly plotted graph cites 2 sources:
(CO2 plot) Berner et al 2001
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
("Temperature" plot) Scotese's old website:
scotese.com/climate.htm
1. Heib's badly plotted graph cites 2 sources:
(CO2 plot) Berner et al 2001
ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61570
("Temperature" plot) Scotese's old website:
scotese.com/climate.htm
Wielicki couldn't get tenure at UAH.
His h-index was really low (9) & he was making a fool of himself by posting easily refuted disinformation & ignorant opinions about climate change on social media.
He misrepresents himself as an "expert" on climate change
www.mediamatters.org/climate-deni...
His h-index was really low (9) & he was making a fool of himself by posting easily refuted disinformation & ignorant opinions about climate change on social media.
He misrepresents himself as an "expert" on climate change
www.mediamatters.org/climate-deni...
December 14, 2024 at 2:18 PM
Wielicki couldn't get tenure at UAH.
His h-index was really low (9) & he was making a fool of himself by posting easily refuted disinformation & ignorant opinions about climate change on social media.
He misrepresents himself as an "expert" on climate change
www.mediamatters.org/climate-deni...
His h-index was really low (9) & he was making a fool of himself by posting easily refuted disinformation & ignorant opinions about climate change on social media.
He misrepresents himself as an "expert" on climate change
www.mediamatters.org/climate-deni...
See Matthew Wielicki's posts on X about getting his account suspended.
He's still lying and misrepresenting himself as an "expert" on climate change. It's not his field. He has zero published research papers on climate change.
He monetises disinformation on social media.
x.com/MatthewWieli...
He's still lying and misrepresenting himself as an "expert" on climate change. It's not his field. He has zero published research papers on climate change.
He monetises disinformation on social media.
x.com/MatthewWieli...
December 14, 2024 at 1:28 PM
See Matthew Wielicki's posts on X about getting his account suspended.
He's still lying and misrepresenting himself as an "expert" on climate change. It's not his field. He has zero published research papers on climate change.
He monetises disinformation on social media.
x.com/MatthewWieli...
He's still lying and misrepresenting himself as an "expert" on climate change. It's not his field. He has zero published research papers on climate change.
He monetises disinformation on social media.
x.com/MatthewWieli...
December 14, 2024 at 9:19 AM
An hour ago, I reported Wielicki drwielicki.bsky.social for impersonating an "expert" on climate change and posting disinformation. A few others must have done the same thing.
His account has been suspended 😅
bsky.app/profile/ceis...
His account has been suspended 😅
bsky.app/profile/ceis...
December 14, 2024 at 1:57 AM
An hour ago, I reported Wielicki drwielicki.bsky.social for impersonating an "expert" on climate change and posting disinformation. A few others must have done the same thing.
His account has been suspended 😅
bsky.app/profile/ceis...
His account has been suspended 😅
bsky.app/profile/ceis...
It's impossible to have an honest exchange with Wielicki. He was never able to address any of the evidence I posted refuting his disinformation. His only responses were yawning emojis, snide comments, spamming with the same already debunked lies or multiple blocks.
Yet he claimed he "never blocks"
Yet he claimed he "never blocks"
December 14, 2024 at 1:42 AM
It's impossible to have an honest exchange with Wielicki. He was never able to address any of the evidence I posted refuting his disinformation. His only responses were yawning emojis, snide comments, spamming with the same already debunked lies or multiple blocks.
Yet he claimed he "never blocks"
Yet he claimed he "never blocks"
@drwielicki.bsky.social's header is a memed-up graph that implies modern GLOBAL warming is not unusual.
What Wielicki DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's ONLY Central England temperature.
He's a dishonest disinformer.
Original grapht.co/jdX5ATZw8u
What Wielicki DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's ONLY Central England temperature.
He's a dishonest disinformer.
Original grapht.co/jdX5ATZw8u
December 14, 2024 at 12:23 AM
@drwielicki.bsky.social's header is a memed-up graph that implies modern GLOBAL warming is not unusual.
What Wielicki DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's ONLY Central England temperature.
He's a dishonest disinformer.
Original grapht.co/jdX5ATZw8u
What Wielicki DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's ONLY Central England temperature.
He's a dishonest disinformer.
Original grapht.co/jdX5ATZw8u
Matthew Wielicki just joined BSky drwielicki.bsky.social
Note that he likes his own posts 🤣
His header is a memed-up graph that implies modern GLOBAL warming is not unusual.
What he DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's only Central England data
Original graph
t.co/jdX5ATZw8u
Note that he likes his own posts 🤣
His header is a memed-up graph that implies modern GLOBAL warming is not unusual.
What he DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's only Central England data
Original graph
t.co/jdX5ATZw8u
December 13, 2024 at 10:50 PM
Matthew Wielicki just joined BSky drwielicki.bsky.social
Note that he likes his own posts 🤣
His header is a memed-up graph that implies modern GLOBAL warming is not unusual.
What he DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's only Central England data
Original graph
t.co/jdX5ATZw8u
Note that he likes his own posts 🤣
His header is a memed-up graph that implies modern GLOBAL warming is not unusual.
What he DIDN'T show is that it's NOT GLOBAL mean temperature, it's only Central England data
Original graph
t.co/jdX5ATZw8u