The meme I shared is about Christian fascists (hints their stance on abortion yes)
And 'my post' is clearly about Islamists (fascists by definition) who will silence and m#rder any one who criticizes Islam.
(sorry for delay in reply)

È meglio di niente, ma ho una perplessità: quando la Russia ha invaso l'Ucraina, a sinistra ci si è detti che misure di boicottaggio come questa, che penalizzano i civili russi, servano a poco e siano ingiuste.

Adesso nel caso dei cittadini israeliani sono invece misure sensate. Perché?

Coddare per imbarazzo non mi è mai successo.

FINALMENTE DUE DI DESTRA CHE NON FANNO I FINOCCHI COL CULO DEGLI ALTRI.

Io quando leggo ste roba vado fuori di testa. Ma come puoi militare in un partito che vuole toglierti qualsiasi diritto, che applaude alla non approvarzione di una legge che ti avrebbe fatto vivere meglio, che usa il tuo orientamento come elemento di scherno. Sindrome di Stoccolma?

Meno male sono migrato e non sono tornato per Pasqua.

For example, after the fall of Mussolini in Italy the State was still centralised until the '70s.
Then local autonomy started.
Special bylaws were granted for some regions. Sardinia for example.

Now, I'm a Sardinian independentist. I'd start independence with centralisation. Just saying. 😛

Somehow I agree. This is inside an engaging dialectic between centralisation and local autonomy. It really depends on the historical tool which is needed: the aim is always the emancipation of the proletariat, of women, of the individual.

I see it now in a laic way: not eternal theories but tools.

Just formally because on the paper, it's ok. In practice, either we state that democracy is working for the poorest and the outcasts, or democracy has been converted into an empty procedure.

In this case, procedure is not matching the direction. Thus we must first build a government of the people.

I mean, historically speaking, the parliament was a tool that the noblesse had against monarchical absolutism.

Parliament became republic. Republic was compelled to be more democratic, by extending representativity without looking at the wealth, at the colour and the gender.

Just formally.

Democracy is important, that's why aside from being a procedure, it must have a meaningful direction.

Now, we keep the procedure, but we delay the goal by avoiding any coercion.

At this point, someone would rise the finger up and suggest we could even abandon any velleity of socialist paradigm.

It's the anarchist wet dream. I used to be anarchist. Then it comes the practical issue: which tools have we to manage the building of a socialist society?

The dictatorship of the proletariat can be translated into hegemony, more than into tyranny.

In any case, any progress must be protected! 😉