Chris Conlon
@cconlon.bsky.social
IO Economist @ NYU Stern. https://chrisconlon.github.io
Unfortunately this is misleading in two ways:
1. Section 12 of the 2010 HMG's also discussed monopsony power over input providers (including workers)
2. The judge ruled that the FTC did not prove their case re: effects on workers, but was it moot bc they won on product market.
1. Section 12 of the 2010 HMG's also discussed monopsony power over input providers (including workers)
2. The judge ruled that the FTC did not prove their case re: effects on workers, but was it moot bc they won on product market.
December 12, 2024 at 4:46 PM
Unfortunately this is misleading in two ways:
1. Section 12 of the 2010 HMG's also discussed monopsony power over input providers (including workers)
2. The judge ruled that the FTC did not prove their case re: effects on workers, but was it moot bc they won on product market.
1. Section 12 of the 2010 HMG's also discussed monopsony power over input providers (including workers)
2. The judge ruled that the FTC did not prove their case re: effects on workers, but was it moot bc they won on product market.