If your study hinges on squeezing out every cell, go with GEMX. But if you are balancing budget and performance, PIPseq might be something to consider. We now added PIPseq to our services.
If your study hinges on squeezing out every cell, go with GEMX. But if you are balancing budget and performance, PIPseq might be something to consider. We now added PIPseq to our services.
GEMX has the edge in cell detection, but PIPseq performs respectably at roughly half the price. For many experiments, that trade off could be worth it.
GEMX has the edge in cell detection, but PIPseq performs respectably at roughly half the price. For many experiments, that trade off could be worth it.
Very close. Both platforms delivered comparable gene detection per cell and high transcriptome mapping rates. Both platforms found the same cell types.
Very close. Both platforms delivered comparable gene detection per cell and high transcriptome mapping rates. Both platforms found the same cell types.
GEMX detected significantly more cells (24,339 vs 15,324) average cells using Empty Drops on all samples for fair cell calling comparison, indicating higher sensitivity in cell calling.
GEMX detected significantly more cells (24,339 vs 15,324) average cells using Empty Drops on all samples for fair cell calling comparison, indicating higher sensitivity in cell calling.